{ "$schema": "https://thekingdom.dev/truth/schemas/v0.1/public-snapshot.schema.json", "artifact": { "asOf": "2026-08-26", "id": "polyphonic-claim-atlas-2026-08-26", "immutableHistoricalArtifact": true, "mutableAlias": false, "phase": "PHASE_0", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "state": "STATIC_SYNTHETIC_PHASE_0", "version": "0.1.0" }, "assessmentDispositions": [ "NOT_ASSESSED_UNDER_NAMED_METHOD", "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "CONTESTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INCOMPARABLE_UNDER_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD", "UNKNOWN_UNDER_NAMED_METHOD" ], "authorship": { "humanReviewCompleted": false, "producer": "KINGDOM Polyphonic Claim Atlas Phase-0 producer", "publicationAuthorized": true, "reviewState": "INDEPENDENT_REVIEW_COMPLETE" }, "buildProvenance": { "clockRead": false, "jsonInputReceipts": [ { "byteSha256": "sha256:e484094762e36e2740085ab8196678fa8c3f52b5463037f309fbe91822518f19", "bytes": 41151, "canonicalSha256": "sha256:b9a7288b1e81b4a811a5a10fa57ab034ef5bcb6a2014a7c0bb4b761f36f46c5b", "path": "data/config.json" }, { "byteSha256": "sha256:f3fd0423647aba5f5fbdf1527f78acaf0dbd98ad1b717cb0decdeb74aae40213", "bytes": 134503, "canonicalSha256": "sha256:8575bcd2c1f5f6f219b532b473bc36af292056e6a25e8cec45c360145a2f52f0", "path": "data/fixtures.json" } ], "localeUsed": false, "mode": "DETERMINISTIC_OFFLINE_ZERO_DEPENDENCY", "networkUsed": false, "randomnessUsed": false, "textInputReceipts": [ { "byteSha256": "sha256:974cb357ad1f5a23fa3f8798e444bbfb4dc43b1bf8aa1d14609599877ed13126", "bytes": 9188, "path": "guide/public-guide.md" }, { "byteSha256": "sha256:7f930dd4a892db986d4711d5c5dfcde9e2cab9312e6b555da202df89fa76768e", "bytes": 26075, "path": "src/atlas.mjs" }, { "byteSha256": "sha256:d0fffb0ed0048ff2ae38bf725e6bac45713891255aa8764f7a8de5527b913d17", "bytes": 3880, "path": "src/cli.mjs" }, { "byteSha256": "sha256:cf62f8b176165c818633d2cb680adcd82825bc81353e60a0d8e7dfa2574237a8", "bytes": 13152, "path": "src/io.mjs" }, { "byteSha256": "sha256:7337f0ec72d11a0fd6159c3605c8675a8607900f8c58a38733e736548ff2d4e9", "bytes": 16489, "path": "src/schema-definition.mjs" }, { "byteSha256": "sha256:0e091497bcb968ba71d6554efc51c37bc582f6608901e80cd0bf0ca749513514", "bytes": 9700, "path": "src/schema-validator.mjs" } ] }, "cases": [ { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "signed-false-statement:condition-1", "signed-false-statement:evidence-2" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "signed-false-statement", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "signed-false-statement:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "This disposition is authored fixture behavior, not an oracle result or a judgment about the signer.", "methodId": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "rationale": "Five differs from the author-stipulated count of three.", "scope": "Comparison with condition-1 inside this synthetic fixture only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "signed-false-statement:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "signed-false-statement:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The synthetic tray contains exactly three tiles during the fixture." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "signed-false-statement:expression-1" ], "id": "signed-false-statement:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The synthetic tray contains five tiles during the fixture.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The one declared tray.", "temporalQualifier": "During the declared fixture time." } ], "declaredQuestion": "What does the signature establish, and what must be tested separately?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "signed-false-statement:claim-1" ], "description": "A stipulated valid signature binds the note bytes to the synthetic signer role.", "direction": "DOES_NOT_BEAR_ON_CORRESPONDENCE", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "signed-false-statement:evidence-1", "integrityState": "DECLARED_INTACT", "kind": "SYNTHETIC_SIGNATURE_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "FIXTURE_PROVENANCE_RECORD" }, { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "signed-false-statement:claim-1" ], "description": "The stipulated fixture comparison counts three tiles.", "direction": "CHALLENGES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "signed-false-statement:evidence-2", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_INSPECTION", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "signed-false-statement:claim-1" ], "form": "The tray contains five tiles.", "genre": "INVENTED_REPORT", "id": "signed-false-statement:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The signature is stipulated valid only for origin and byte integrity.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SIGNED_SYNTHETIC_NOTE", "speakerRole": "SYNTHETIC_SIGNER", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" } ], "id": "signed-false-statement", "lesson": "Origin and integrity do not establish content correspondence.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "The signature does not make the assertion true.", "The fixture does not classify or score the synthetic signer." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A sealed synthetic note says a tray contains five tiles. The author-stipulated tray contains three.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "A valid signature on a contradicted claim" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:reasoning-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "valid-inference-false-premise", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "valid-inference-false-premise:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "This assessment says nothing about whether either empirical premise obtains.", "methodId": "FORMAL_VALIDITY_CHECK", "rationale": "The multiplication conclusion follows from the two stated premises.", "scope": "Only the declared inference form.", "targetClaimIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-4" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:condition-1", "valid-inference-false-premise:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "valid-inference-false-premise", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "valid-inference-false-premise:assessment-2", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "This fixture assessment does not invalidate the inference rule itself.", "methodId": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "rationale": "Two gates of width two yield four units, not four gates or eight units.", "scope": "The stipulated wall description only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-1", "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-3" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:condition-1", "valid-inference-false-premise:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "valid-inference-false-premise", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "valid-inference-false-premise:assessment-3", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Scoped support for this premise does not support the contradicted gate count.", "methodId": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "rationale": "The two-unit width matches the author-stipulated condition.", "scope": "Width of each stipulated gate only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-2" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "valid-inference-false-premise:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The synthetic wall has two gates and each gate is two units wide." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:expression-1" ], "id": "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The synthetic wall has four gates.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The one declared wall.", "temporalQualifier": "During the fixture." }, { "expressionIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:expression-1" ], "id": "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-2", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "Each gate is two units wide.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The declared gates.", "temporalQualifier": "During the fixture." }, { "expressionIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:expression-1" ], "id": "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-3", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The total gate width is eight units.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The declared wall.", "temporalQualifier": "During the fixture." }, { "expressionIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:expression-1" ], "id": "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-4", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "Given claims 1 and 2, claim 3 follows by multiplication.", "regime": "FORMAL_LOGICAL", "scope": "The declared premises and ordinary arithmetic rule.", "temporalQualifier": "Atemporal within the fixture model." } ], "declaredQuestion": "Can an inference be valid while its empirical conclusion is contradicted?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-1", "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-2", "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-3" ], "description": "The stipulated wall description contains two gates of two units each.", "direction": "MIXED_BEARING", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "valid-inference-false-premise:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_INSPECTION", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-1", "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-2", "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-3", "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-4" ], "form": "There are four gates; each is two units wide; therefore total gate width is eight units.", "genre": "INVENTED_PROOF_SKETCH", "id": "valid-inference-false-premise:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The multiplication rule is interpreted under ordinary finite arithmetic.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_CALCULATION", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_REASONER", "speechAct": "ARGUMENT" } ], "id": "valid-inference-false-premise", "lesson": "Formal validity and premise correspondence are separate questions.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "Formal validity is not a global truth label.", "A contradicted premise does not imply defective arithmetic." ], "reasoning": [ { "conclusionClaimId": "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-3", "id": "valid-inference-false-premise:reasoning-1", "level": "L0_REASONING", "premiseClaimIds": [ "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-1", "valid-inference-false-premise:claim-2" ], "rule": "gate_count multiplied by width_per_gate equals total_gate_width", "structuralNote": "The consequence is structurally valid under the declared premises." } ], "scenario": "A calculation assumes four gates of width two, but the stipulated fixture has two such gates.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "Valid consequence from a contradicted premise" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:condition-1", "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Support for the conclusion does not support the offered inference.", "methodId": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "rationale": "The conclusion matches the author-stipulated token count.", "scope": "The stipulated token count only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-2" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:reasoning-1" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:assessment-2", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "This assessment does not challenge the token count itself.", "methodId": "FORMAL_VALIDITY_CHECK", "rationale": "No declared rule makes token count follow from box shape.", "scope": "The declared inference form only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-3" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:condition-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:assessment-3", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Scoped support for box shape does not make token count follow from shape.", "methodId": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "rationale": "The box's squareness matches the author-stipulated condition.", "scope": "Shape of the stipulated box only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The synthetic box is square and contains four red tokens." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:expression-1" ], "id": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The synthetic box is square.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The declared box.", "temporalQualifier": "During the fixture." }, { "expressionIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:expression-1" ], "id": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-2", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The synthetic box contains four red tokens.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The declared box.", "temporalQualifier": "During the fixture." }, { "expressionIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:expression-1" ], "id": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-3", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "Claim 2 follows from claim 1 alone.", "regime": "FORMAL_LOGICAL", "scope": "The declared one-premise argument.", "temporalQualifier": "Atemporal within the fixture model." } ], "declaredQuestion": "Can a conclusion match the fixture while the offered reasoning fails?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-2" ], "description": "The stipulated fixture describes four red tokens.", "direction": "SUPPORTS", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_INSPECTION", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-1", "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-2", "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-3" ], "form": "The box is square, therefore it contains four red tokens.", "genre": "INVENTED_PROOF_SKETCH", "id": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "No rule connecting squareness to token count is declared.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_ARGUMENT", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_REASONER", "speechAct": "ARGUMENT" } ], "id": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference", "lesson": "A supported conclusion does not repair an invalid argument.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "A matching conclusion does not validate the route used to reach it.", "This fixture does not infer competence or intent." ], "reasoning": [ { "conclusionClaimId": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-2", "id": "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:reasoning-1", "level": "L0_REASONING", "premiseClaimIds": [ "true-conclusion-invalid-inference:claim-1" ], "rule": "No connecting rule is declared.", "structuralNote": "The premise does not entail the conclusion." } ], "scenario": "A box contains four red tokens. An argument concludes four solely because the box is square.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "Supported conclusion reached by invalid reasoning" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:condition-1", "two-coherent-narratives:narrative-1" ], "disposition": "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "two-coherent-narratives", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "two-coherent-narratives:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "No whole-story verdict and no narrator assessment is produced.", "methodId": "NARRATIVE_SELECTION_AUDIT", "rationale": "Selected events are stipulated, while the causal attribution is not.", "scope": "Story A selection, order and causal fragment only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:condition-1", "two-coherent-narratives:narrative-2" ], "disposition": "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "two-coherent-narratives", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "two-coherent-narratives:assessment-2", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Coherence is recorded separately from correspondence and fidelity.", "methodId": "NARRATIVE_SELECTION_AUDIT", "rationale": "Selected events are stipulated, while chronology is reordered and causation unstipulated.", "scope": "Story B selection, order and causal fragment only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:claim-2" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "two-coherent-narratives:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The four declared events occur in sequence; the fixture does not stipulate why the crowd moved." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:expression-1" ], "id": "two-coherent-narratives:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "Within story A, gate closure caused the crowd movement.", "regime": "NARRATIVE_CLAIM_FRAGMENT", "scope": "The causal fragment extracted from story A.", "temporalQualifier": "Across events 1 and 2." }, { "expressionIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:expression-2" ], "id": "two-coherent-narratives:claim-2", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "Within story B, the bell prompted the crowd movement.", "regime": "NARRATIVE_CLAIM_FRAGMENT", "scope": "The causal fragment extracted from story B.", "temporalQualifier": "Across events 2 and 3 as narratively reordered." } ], "declaredQuestion": "How can two coherent stories differ without assigning one whole-story truth status?", "events": [ { "conditionIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:condition-1" ], "description": "The east gate closes.", "id": "two-coherent-narratives:event-1", "sequenceIndex": 1 }, { "conditionIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:condition-1" ], "description": "The crowd begins moving west.", "id": "two-coherent-narratives:event-2", "sequenceIndex": 2 }, { "conditionIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:condition-1" ], "description": "A bell sounds.", "id": "two-coherent-narratives:event-3", "sequenceIndex": 3 }, { "conditionIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:condition-1" ], "description": "The east gate reopens.", "id": "two-coherent-narratives:event-4", "sequenceIndex": 4 } ], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:claim-1", "two-coherent-narratives:claim-2" ], "description": "The fixture stipulates event occurrence and sequence but no causal mechanism.", "direction": "CONTEXTUALISES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "two-coherent-narratives:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_EVENT_SEQUENCE", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:claim-1" ], "form": "The closure redirected the crowd; the bell merely marked the interval.", "genre": "INVENTED_CHRONICLE", "id": "two-coherent-narratives:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "This expression selects closure and movement as its causal frame.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_STORY_A", "speakerRole": "NARRATOR_ROLE_A", "speechAct": "NARRATION" }, { "assertsClaimIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:claim-2" ], "form": "The bell prompted the crowd to move while the closed gate shaped the route.", "genre": "INVENTED_CHRONICLE", "id": "two-coherent-narratives:expression-2", "interpretationNote": "This expression selects the bell as prompt and the gate as constraint.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_STORY_B", "speakerRole": "NARRATOR_ROLE_B", "speechAct": "NARRATION" } ], "id": "two-coherent-narratives", "lesson": "Narrative coherence, selection, causal attribution and correspondence require separate inspection.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [ { "audience": "PHASE_0_READER", "causalAttributions": [ { "basis": "NARRATOR_ASSERTED_NOT_FIXTURE_ESTABLISHED", "fromEventId": "two-coherent-narratives:event-1", "relation": "CAUSED", "toEventId": "two-coherent-narratives:event-2" } ], "claimFragmentIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:claim-1" ], "coherenceNote": "The selected sequence is internally intelligible.", "correspondenceNote": "The causal attribution is not stipulated by the fixture.", "counterstoryIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:narrative-2" ], "counterstorySearchState": "REFERENCED", "fidelityNote": "It includes three stipulated events and omits the bell.", "genre": "INVENTED_CHRONICLE", "id": "two-coherent-narratives:narrative-1", "level": "L0_NARRATIVE_ARTIFACT", "omittedEventIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:event-3" ], "orderedEventIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:event-1", "two-coherent-narratives:event-2", "two-coherent-narratives:event-4" ], "selectedEventIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:event-1", "two-coherent-narratives:event-2", "two-coherent-narratives:event-4" ], "selectionRationale": "Foreground the gate as the organizing constraint on movement.", "selectorRole": "NARRATOR_ROLE_A", "standpoint": "GATE_OBSERVER_FRAME", "title": "Closure and redirection" }, { "audience": "PHASE_0_READER", "causalAttributions": [ { "basis": "NARRATOR_ASSERTED_NOT_FIXTURE_ESTABLISHED", "fromEventId": "two-coherent-narratives:event-3", "relation": "PROMPTED", "toEventId": "two-coherent-narratives:event-2" } ], "claimFragmentIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:claim-2" ], "coherenceNote": "The narrated order supplies an intelligible prompt structure.", "correspondenceNote": "Neither the reordered chronology nor causal prompt is stipulated by the fixture.", "counterstoryIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:narrative-1" ], "counterstorySearchState": "REFERENCED", "fidelityNote": "It includes three stipulated events, omits reopening and reorders bell before movement.", "genre": "INVENTED_CHRONICLE", "id": "two-coherent-narratives:narrative-2", "level": "L0_NARRATIVE_ARTIFACT", "omittedEventIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:event-4" ], "orderedEventIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:event-1", "two-coherent-narratives:event-3", "two-coherent-narratives:event-2" ], "selectedEventIds": [ "two-coherent-narratives:event-1", "two-coherent-narratives:event-2", "two-coherent-narratives:event-3" ], "selectionRationale": "Foreground the audible marker as the organizing prompt for movement.", "selectorRole": "NARRATOR_ROLE_B", "standpoint": "SOUND_OBSERVER_FRAME", "title": "Bell and movement" } ], "nonClaims": [ "Neither narrative receives a whole-story truth status.", "Internal coherence does not establish causal correspondence." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A synthetic square experiences a gate closure, crowd movement, a bell and later reopening. Two stories select different events and causes.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "Two coherent stories selecting one event set" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "official-correction:condition-1", "official-correction:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "official-correction", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "official-correction:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Retraction, correction and source intent are not inferred from this disposition.", "methodId": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "rationale": "Twelve differs from the stipulated count of seven.", "scope": "Bulletin one's count compared with condition-1.", "targetClaimIds": [ "official-correction:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "official-correction:condition-1", "official-correction:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "official-correction", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "official-correction:assessment-2", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Official status is not part of the comparison method.", "methodId": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "rationale": "Seven matches the stipulated fixture count.", "scope": "Correction bulletin's count compared with condition-1.", "targetClaimIds": [ "official-correction:claim-2" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "official-correction:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The stipulated fixture count is seven units." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "official-correction:expression-1" ], "id": "official-correction:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The fixture count is twelve units.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The declared count.", "temporalQualifier": "As asserted in bulletin one." }, { "expressionIds": [ "official-correction:expression-2" ], "id": "official-correction:claim-2", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The fixture count is seven units.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The declared count.", "temporalQualifier": "As asserted in the correction bulletin." } ], "declaredQuestion": "How can a correction repair reliance without turning lifecycle into a truth verdict?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "official-correction:claim-1", "official-correction:claim-2" ], "description": "The author-stipulated count is seven.", "direction": "MIXED_BEARING", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "official-correction:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_INSPECTION", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "official-correction:claim-1" ], "form": "Official bulletin one: the count is twelve.", "genre": "INVENTED_OFFICIAL_RECORD", "id": "official-correction:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "Official publication status is stipulated but not empirical accuracy.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_OFFICIAL_BULLETIN", "speakerRole": "SYNTHETIC_OFFICE", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" }, { "assertsClaimIds": [ "official-correction:claim-2" ], "form": "Correction bulletin: replace twelve with seven for this count.", "genre": "INVENTED_OFFICIAL_RECORD", "id": "official-correction:expression-2", "interpretationNote": "The correction supersedes the active record while preserving the earlier bulletin.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_OFFICIAL_BULLETIN", "speakerRole": "SYNTHETIC_OFFICE", "speechAct": "CORRECTION" } ], "id": "official-correction", "lesson": "Official status, correction lifecycle and empirical assessment are distinct.", "lifecycleRecords": [ { "asOf": "2026-08-26", "establishesTruthOrFalsehood": false, "id": "official-correction:lifecycle-1", "preservesHistory": true, "reason": "The synthetic office issued an explicit replacement count.", "replacementExpressionIds": [ "official-correction:expression-2" ], "scope": "Active count record for this fixture only.", "state": "CORRECTED", "targetExpressionIds": [ "official-correction:expression-1" ] } ], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "Correction lifecycle is not itself a falsehood verdict.", "Official publication does not establish empirical correspondence." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A synthetic office first publishes a count of twelve, then corrects it to seven while retaining the earlier record.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "An official record corrected without erasing history" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "institutional-versus-empirical:condition-1", "institutional-versus-empirical:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "institutional-versus-empirical", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "institutional-versus-empirical:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "This method does not assess physical conditions or moral legitimacy.", "methodId": "AUTHORITY_SCOPE_CHECK", "rationale": "The declared role and procedure satisfy the fixture's institutional rule.", "scope": "Felicity and authority under the invented garden rule only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "institutional-versus-empirical:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "institutional-versus-empirical:condition-2" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "institutional-versus-empirical", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "institutional-versus-empirical:assessment-2", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "The empirical disposition does not undo the garden's institutional open status.", "methodId": "CAUSAL_MODEL_CHECK", "rationale": "The stipulated paths remain wet after the declaration.", "scope": "Physical path condition in this fixture only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "institutional-versus-empirical:claim-2" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "institutional-versus-empirical:condition-1", "scope": "The invented garden rule only.", "statement": "The council role has fixture authority to set the garden's open status at noon." }, { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "institutional-versus-empirical:condition-2", "scope": "The invented garden conditions only.", "statement": "Rain leaves the synthetic garden paths wet at noon." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "institutional-versus-empirical:expression-1" ], "id": "institutional-versus-empirical:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The garden has open status from noon under the synthetic rule.", "regime": "PERFORMATIVE_OR_DIRECTIVE", "scope": "The declared garden institution.", "temporalQualifier": "From noon on the fixture date." }, { "expressionIds": [ "institutional-versus-empirical:expression-2" ], "id": "institutional-versus-empirical:claim-2", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The declaration caused the garden paths to be dry.", "regime": "CAUSAL", "scope": "The physical paths in the synthetic garden.", "temporalQualifier": "At noon on the fixture date." } ], "declaredQuestion": "What can an authorized declaration make institutionally so?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "institutional-versus-empirical:claim-1", "institutional-versus-empirical:claim-2" ], "description": "The fixture grants the council role authority to set open status only.", "direction": "MIXED_BEARING", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "institutional-versus-empirical:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_AUTHORITY_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "institutional-versus-empirical:claim-1" ], "form": "Under the garden rule, the garden is open from noon.", "genre": "INVENTED_INSTITUTIONAL_RECORD", "id": "institutional-versus-empirical:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The declaration operates only within the stipulated institutional rule.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_DECLARATION", "speakerRole": "AUTHORIZED_SYNTHETIC_COUNCIL", "speechAct": "DECLARATION" }, { "assertsClaimIds": [ "institutional-versus-empirical:claim-2" ], "form": "Because the council opened the garden, the paths are dry.", "genre": "INVENTED_REPORT", "id": "institutional-versus-empirical:expression-2", "interpretationNote": "The expression improperly carries institutional force into a physical claim.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_COMMENT", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_COMMENTATOR", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" } ], "id": "institutional-versus-empirical", "lesson": "A performative can constitute institutional status without changing an empirical condition.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "The atlas does not grant the council real authority.", "Institutional validity is not empirical or moral validity." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A synthetic council validly declares a garden open while stipulated rain keeps its paths wet.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "An effective declaration with no physical power" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "testimony-uptake-injustice:expression-1", "testimony-uptake-injustice:evidence-1", "testimony-uptake-injustice:evidence-2" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "testimony-uptake-injustice", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "testimony-uptake-injustice:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Relay count is not credibility or evidential strength; this does not score the witness, infer identity or establish all details of the reported event.", "methodId": "TESTIMONY_UPTAKE_AUDIT", "rationale": "The fixture contains the report, stipulates nearby access and separately records lower social distribution than the remote office report.", "scope": "Existence and access conditions of this testimony only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "testimony-uptake-injustice:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "testimony-uptake-injustice:condition-1" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "testimony-uptake-injustice", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "testimony-uptake-injustice:assessment-2", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "This illustrates archive incompleteness; it does not generalize to real testimony or institutions.", "methodId": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "rationale": "The fixture stipulates a leak despite archive silence.", "scope": "The leak condition stipulated by condition-1.", "targetClaimIds": [ "testimony-uptake-injustice:claim-2" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "testimony-uptake-injustice:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "A synthetic pipe leaks and the anonymous observer role is nearby while the office role is remote." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "testimony-uptake-injustice:expression-1" ], "id": "testimony-uptake-injustice:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The anonymous observer role reports seeing water escape from the pipe.", "regime": "TESTIMONIAL", "scope": "The one report and its declared access conditions.", "temporalQualifier": "During the fixture observation window." }, { "expressionIds": [ "testimony-uptake-injustice:expression-2" ], "id": "testimony-uptake-injustice:claim-2", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "No leak occurred because the office archive contains no entry.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The synthetic pipe and office archive.", "temporalQualifier": "During the fixture observation window." } ], "declaredQuestion": "What changes when power affects who is heard rather than what was observed?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "testimony-uptake-injustice:claim-1", "testimony-uptake-injustice:claim-2" ], "description": "The observer role has direct stipulated proximity; the office role has only archive access.", "direction": "MIXED_BEARING", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "testimony-uptake-injustice:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_ACCESS_COMPARISON", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" }, { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "testimony-uptake-injustice:claim-1", "testimony-uptake-injustice:claim-2" ], "description": "The anonymous report receives one synthetic relay while the office report receives eight; relay count is social distribution only.", "direction": "DOES_NOT_BEAR_ON_CORRESPONDENCE", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "testimony-uptake-injustice:evidence-2", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_SOCIAL_UPTAKE_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "testimony-uptake-injustice:claim-1" ], "form": "I observed water escaping from the pipe.", "genre": "INVENTED_FIRST_PERSON_REPORT", "id": "testimony-uptake-injustice:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "Anonymity is preserved and not converted into a credibility penalty.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_ANONYMOUS_TESTIMONY", "speakerRole": "ANONYMOUS_NEARBY_OBSERVER", "speechAct": "TESTIMONY" }, { "assertsClaimIds": [ "testimony-uptake-injustice:claim-2" ], "form": "The office record contains no leak entry, so no leak occurred.", "genre": "INVENTED_OFFICIAL_RECORD", "id": "testimony-uptake-injustice:expression-2", "interpretationNote": "Archive silence is presented as event absence.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_OFFICE_REPORT", "speakerRole": "REMOTE_OFFICE_ROLE", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" } ], "id": "testimony-uptake-injustice", "lesson": "Social uptake and evidential access are different; neither licenses a witness score.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "Anonymity is not low credibility.", "The atlas never creates a witness or institution score." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A nearby anonymous observer reports a leak. A distant office report omits it and receives wider uptake.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "Relevant testimony receives less uptake" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "syndicated-source-dependence:condition-1", "syndicated-source-dependence:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "syndicated-source-dependence", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "syndicated-source-dependence:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "The audit does not assess whether the underlying flag assertion corresponds to the fixture world.", "methodId": "SOURCE_INDEPENDENCE_AUDIT", "rationale": "The derivation graph contains one upstream assertion, not five independent observations.", "scope": "Independence of the five declared report nodes only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "syndicated-source-dependence:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "syndicated-source-dependence:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "All five reports derive from one upstream assertion and contain no independent observation." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "syndicated-source-dependence:expression-1" ], "id": "syndicated-source-dependence:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "Five independent observations support the flag assertion.", "regime": "PROCEDURAL", "scope": "The provenance structure of the five synthetic reports.", "temporalQualifier": "At fixture publication time." } ], "declaredQuestion": "How many independent observations exist when reports are syndicated?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "syndicated-source-dependence:claim-1" ], "description": "Each of five report nodes points to the same upstream note.", "direction": "CHALLENGES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "syndicated-source-dependence:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_DERIVATION_GRAPH", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "syndicated-source-dependence:claim-1" ], "form": "Five sources independently confirm that the synthetic flag is raised.", "genre": "INVENTED_MEDIA_SUMMARY", "id": "syndicated-source-dependence:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The expression claims independence, not merely five copies.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_SUMMARY", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_AGGREGATOR", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" } ], "id": "syndicated-source-dependence", "lesson": "Source count and repetition do not establish independent support.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "Five copies are not five independent sources.", "Source dependence is not a source-worth score." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "Five synthetic outlets repeat one upstream note without independent observation.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "Five reports with one upstream assertion" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "hallucinated-citation:condition-1", "hallucinated-citation:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "hallucinated-citation", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "hallucinated-citation:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Catalogue absence outside this closed fixture is not inferred, and no model-wide reliability claim is made.", "methodId": "CITATION_EXISTENCE_CHECK", "rationale": "Z-99 is absent from the complete stipulated catalogue.", "scope": "Existence of Z-99 in the declared catalogue only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "hallucinated-citation:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "hallucinated-citation:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture catalogue only.", "statement": "The closed fixture catalogue contains identifiers A-01 and A-02 but not Z-99." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "hallucinated-citation:expression-1" ], "id": "hallucinated-citation:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "Identifier Z-99 exists in the declared fixture catalogue.", "regime": "PROCEDURAL", "scope": "The closed fixture catalogue.", "temporalQualifier": "At the fixture as-of date." } ], "declaredQuestion": "What may be concluded when a citation-shaped string has no catalogue match?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "hallucinated-citation:claim-1" ], "description": "Exact lookup of Z-99 in the stipulated two-entry catalogue returns no entry.", "direction": "CHALLENGES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "hallucinated-citation:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_CATALOGUE_LOOKUP", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "hallucinated-citation:claim-1" ], "form": "The claim is established by Synthetic Review Z-99.", "genre": "INVENTED_ANSWER", "id": "hallucinated-citation:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "No model runs; the text is a fixed fixture string.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "PRECOMPOSED_SYNTHETIC_MODEL_OUTPUT", "speakerRole": "INERT_MODEL_FIXTURE", "speechAct": "ASSERTION_WITH_CITATION" } ], "id": "hallucinated-citation", "lesson": "Plausible form does not establish source existence or support.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "Citation shape is not source existence.", "One fabricated fixture citation does not produce a model score." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A synthetic model output cites an invented paper identifier that is absent from the closed fixture catalogue.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "A fluent citation absent from the declared catalogue" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "privacy-preserving-refusal:condition-1", "privacy-preserving-refusal:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "privacy-preserving-refusal", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "privacy-preserving-refusal:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "The atlas does not infer private content, motive, belief or intent.", "methodId": "FORMAL_VALIDITY_CHECK", "rationale": "A refusal supplies no answer proposition from which falsehood follows.", "scope": "The inference from the refusal expression alone.", "targetClaimIds": [ "privacy-preserving-refusal:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "privacy-preserving-refusal:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The first expression is a refusal and contains no answer to the private question." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "privacy-preserving-refusal:expression-2" ], "id": "privacy-preserving-refusal:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The refusal establishes that an undisclosed answer would be false.", "regime": "FORMAL_LOGICAL", "scope": "The inference from refusal alone.", "temporalQualifier": "At the fixture dialogue time." } ], "declaredQuestion": "What may be assessed when an expression is a refusal rather than an answer?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "privacy-preserving-refusal:claim-1" ], "description": "The expression is typed as REFUSAL with no answer claim.", "direction": "CHALLENGES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "privacy-preserving-refusal:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_SPEECH_ACT_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [], "form": "I decline to answer that private question.", "genre": "INVENTED_DIALOGUE", "id": "privacy-preserving-refusal:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The refusal is not silently promoted into an answer.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_DIALOGUE", "speakerRole": "PRIVACY_PRESERVING_ROLE", "speechAct": "REFUSAL" }, { "assertsClaimIds": [ "privacy-preserving-refusal:claim-1" ], "form": "The refusal proves the undisclosed answer would be false.", "genre": "INVENTED_DIALOGUE", "id": "privacy-preserving-refusal:expression-2", "interpretationNote": "This expression converts non-disclosure into an unsupported conclusion.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_DIALOGUE", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_OBSERVER", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" } ], "id": "privacy-preserving-refusal", "lesson": "Privacy-preserving non-disclosure is not deception or evidence of falsehood.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "Silence or refusal is not an assertion of a false proposition.", "No private state or intent is inferred." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A synthetic role declines to answer a private question; an observer claims the refusal proves a concealed assertion false.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "A refusal that asserts no hidden proposition" }, { "assessmentAudits": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "cycleDetected": false, "downwardOnly": true, "fixtureId": "self-reference-stratified", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "self-reference-stratified:audit-1", "level": "L2_ASSESSMENT_AUDIT", "methodId": "SELF_REFERENCE_STRATIFICATION_CHECK", "rationale": "The L1 assessment targets only an L0 claim; the L2 audit targets only that L1 assessment.", "scope": "Structural audit of L1 targeting and cycle absence only.", "targetAssessmentIds": [ "self-reference-stratified:assessment-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "self-reference-stratified:condition-1", "self-reference-stratified:expression-1" ], "disposition": "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD", "fixtureId": "self-reference-stratified", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "self-reference-stratified:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD is a refusal to collapse levels, not a truth value for the sentence.", "methodId": "SELF_REFERENCE_STRATIFICATION_CHECK", "rationale": "The fixture declares no fixed-point semantics capable of adjudicating the self-reference.", "scope": "Availability of a declared stratified interpretation method only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "self-reference-stratified:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "self-reference-stratified:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The expression refers to assessment of its own claim and no object-language fixed-point semantics is declared." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "self-reference-stratified:expression-1" ], "id": "self-reference-stratified:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "No named method can support this claim.", "regime": "SELF_REFERENTIAL", "scope": "The sentence's own untyped assessment reference.", "temporalQualifier": "At the fixture as-of date." } ], "declaredQuestion": "How should the atlas handle a sentence referring to its own assessment?", "events": [], "evidence": [], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "self-reference-stratified:claim-1" ], "form": "This claim cannot be supported under any named method.", "genre": "INVENTED_SELF_REFERENCE", "id": "self-reference-stratified:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The content mentions assessment, but the claim remains an L0 target.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_SENTENCE", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_TEXT_ROLE", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" } ], "id": "self-reference-stratified", "lesson": "L0 claims, L1 assessments and L2 audits must not collapse into a fixed point.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "The L1 disposition is not fed back as an L0 premise.", "No paradox receives a fixed-point truth verdict." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A sentence says that no named method can support this very claim. The atlas refuses untyped self-adjudication.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "A self-referential sentence stopped at typed levels" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "consensus-preserves-error:condition-1", "consensus-preserves-error:evidence-2" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "consensus-preserves-error", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "consensus-preserves-error:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "No voice token is ranked or classified.", "methodId": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "rationale": "Red conflicts with the stipulated blue condition; repetition is not used as a correspondence method.", "scope": "Marker colour in this fixture only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "consensus-preserves-error:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "consensus-preserves-error:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The synthetic marker is blue while twelve voice tokens repeat that it is red." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "consensus-preserves-error:expression-1" ], "id": "consensus-preserves-error:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The synthetic marker is red.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The one declared marker.", "temporalQualifier": "During the fixture." } ], "declaredQuestion": "Does unanimous repetition change the relation between a claim and the declared fixture?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "consensus-preserves-error:claim-1" ], "description": "Twelve identical assertion tokens are present.", "direction": "DOES_NOT_BEAR_ON_CORRESPONDENCE", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "consensus-preserves-error:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_REPETITION_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "FIXTURE_CONSENSUS_RECORD" }, { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "consensus-preserves-error:claim-1" ], "description": "The stipulated marker condition is blue.", "direction": "CHALLENGES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "consensus-preserves-error:evidence-2", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_INSPECTION", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "consensus-preserves-error:claim-1" ], "form": "All twelve tokens say the marker is red, therefore it is red.", "genre": "INVENTED_REPORT", "id": "consensus-preserves-error:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "Agreement is the stated basis.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_CONSENSUS_SUMMARY", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_AGGREGATOR", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" } ], "id": "consensus-preserves-error", "lesson": "Consensus and repetition do not establish correspondence.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "Unanimity is not an empirical instrument.", "Consensus does not mint a truth state." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "Twelve synthetic voice tokens repeat that a marker is red; the stipulated marker is blue.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "Unanimous repetition of a challenged claim" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "selective-omission:condition-1", "selective-omission:event-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "selective-omission", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "selective-omission:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "This scoped support cannot be promoted to whole-system status.", "methodId": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "rationale": "The north glow matches the stipulated event.", "scope": "North indicator condition only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "selective-omission:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "selective-omission:condition-1", "selective-omission:event-2", "selective-omission:narrative-1" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "selective-omission", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "selective-omission:assessment-2", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "The assessment targets a claim fragment, not the summarizer's character or intent.", "methodId": "NARRATIVE_SELECTION_AUDIT", "rationale": "A sounding alarm conflicts with the all-nominal generalization.", "scope": "Whole-system generalization and omitted event only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "selective-omission:claim-2" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "selective-omission:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The north indicator glows and the south alarm sounds at the same fixture time." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "selective-omission:expression-1" ], "id": "selective-omission:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The north indicator is glowing.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The north indicator.", "temporalQualifier": "At the fixture status time." }, { "expressionIds": [ "selective-omission:expression-1" ], "id": "selective-omission:claim-2", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "All synthetic systems are nominal.", "regime": "NARRATIVE_CLAIM_FRAGMENT", "scope": "The full north-and-south status set.", "temporalQualifier": "At the fixture status time." } ], "declaredQuestion": "How should selection be exposed without scoring an author or whole story?", "events": [ { "conditionIds": [ "selective-omission:condition-1" ], "description": "The north indicator glows.", "id": "selective-omission:event-1", "sequenceIndex": 1 }, { "conditionIds": [ "selective-omission:condition-1" ], "description": "The south alarm sounds.", "id": "selective-omission:event-2", "sequenceIndex": 2 } ], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "selective-omission:claim-1", "selective-omission:claim-2" ], "description": "The fixture contains both north glow and south alarm events.", "direction": "MIXED_BEARING", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "selective-omission:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_EVENT_SEQUENCE", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "selective-omission:claim-1", "selective-omission:claim-2" ], "form": "The north indicator is glowing; all systems are nominal.", "genre": "INVENTED_STATUS_SUMMARY", "id": "selective-omission:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The second claim generalizes beyond the selected north event.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_STATUS_STORY", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_SUMMARIZER", "speechAct": "NARRATION" } ], "id": "selective-omission", "lesson": "True-seeming fragments can mislead through selection and omission.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [ { "audience": "PHASE_0_READER", "causalAttributions": [], "claimFragmentIds": [ "selective-omission:claim-2" ], "coherenceNote": "The one-event summary is internally coherent.", "correspondenceNote": "Its whole-system generalization conflicts with the omitted stipulated event.", "counterstoryIds": [ "selective-omission:narrative-2" ], "counterstorySearchState": "REFERENCED", "fidelityNote": "It selects the north event and omits the south alarm.", "genre": "INVENTED_STATUS_SUMMARY", "id": "selective-omission:narrative-1", "level": "L0_NARRATIVE_ARTIFACT", "omittedEventIds": [ "selective-omission:event-2" ], "orderedEventIds": [ "selective-omission:event-1" ], "selectedEventIds": [ "selective-omission:event-1" ], "selectionRationale": "Foreground the favorable north-panel observation.", "selectorRole": "FIXTURE_SUMMARIZER", "standpoint": "NORTH_PANEL_FRAME", "title": "North-only status summary" }, { "audience": "PHASE_0_READER", "causalAttributions": [], "claimFragmentIds": [], "coherenceNote": "The two-event frame is internally intelligible.", "correspondenceNote": "It makes no whole-system nominal claim and supplies no causal attribution.", "counterstoryIds": [ "selective-omission:narrative-1" ], "counterstorySearchState": "REFERENCED", "fidelityNote": "It includes both stipulated status events and omits none.", "genre": "INVENTED_STATUS_COUNTERSTORY", "id": "selective-omission:narrative-2", "level": "L0_NARRATIVE_ARTIFACT", "omittedEventIds": [], "orderedEventIds": [ "selective-omission:event-1", "selective-omission:event-2" ], "selectedEventIds": [ "selective-omission:event-1", "selective-omission:event-2" ], "selectionRationale": "Include both stipulated status events to test the north-only selection.", "selectorRole": "PHASE_0_COUNTERSTORY_CONSTRUCTOR", "standpoint": "WHOLE_PANEL_FRAME", "title": "Whole-panel counterstory" } ], "nonClaims": [ "An accurate selected fact can accompany a challenged generalization.", "Omission does not by itself establish deceptive intent." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A summary reports the north indicator glowing and omits a simultaneous south alarm before claiming all systems are nominal.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "Accurate fragments assembled into a misleading summary" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "stale-claim:condition-1", "stale-claim:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "stale-claim", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "stale-claim:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "The assessment does not deny that the report matched T1.", "methodId": "TEMPORAL_SCOPE_CHECK", "rationale": "The fixture stipulates three at T2; the eight-unit value belongs to T1.", "scope": "T2 currentness of the reused T1 expression only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "stale-claim:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "stale-claim:condition-1", "stale-claim:evidence-2" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "stale-claim", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "stale-claim:assessment-2", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Support is limited to the fixture's declared T2 record relation.", "methodId": "TEMPORAL_SCOPE_CHECK", "rationale": "The replacement expression's T2 qualifier and value match the stipulated T2 condition.", "scope": "T2 currentness of the replacement expression only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "stale-claim:claim-2" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "stale-claim:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture sequence only.", "statement": "The synthetic reservoir level is eight at T1 and three at T2." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "stale-claim:expression-1" ], "id": "stale-claim:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The reservoir level is eight units at T2.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The synthetic reservoir.", "temporalQualifier": "At T2 after reuse of a T1 report." }, { "expressionIds": [ "stale-claim:expression-2" ], "id": "stale-claim:claim-2", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The reservoir level is three units at T2.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The synthetic reservoir.", "temporalQualifier": "At T2." } ], "declaredQuestion": "What changes when a supported record is reused after conditions change?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "stale-claim:claim-1" ], "description": "The source report belongs to T1 while the target claim is scoped to T2.", "direction": "CHALLENGES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "stale-claim:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_TEMPORAL_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" }, { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "stale-claim:claim-2" ], "description": "The replacement record explicitly belongs to T2 and states three units.", "direction": "SUPPORTS", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "stale-claim:evidence-2", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_TEMPORAL_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "stale-claim:claim-1" ], "form": "The reservoir level is eight units.", "genre": "INVENTED_STATUS_RECORD", "id": "stale-claim:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The reused expression omits its original T1 qualifier.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_T1_REPORT_REUSED_AT_T2", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_REPORT", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" }, { "assertsClaimIds": [ "stale-claim:claim-2" ], "form": "At T2, the reservoir level is three units.", "genre": "INVENTED_STATUS_RECORD", "id": "stale-claim:expression-2", "interpretationNote": "The replacement expression declares its T2 qualifier.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_T2_REPLACEMENT_REPORT", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_REPORT", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" } ], "id": "stale-claim", "lesson": "Temporal scope and currentness must be explicit.", "lifecycleRecords": [ { "asOf": "2026-08-26", "establishesTruthOrFalsehood": false, "id": "stale-claim:lifecycle-1", "preservesHistory": true, "reason": "The T1 record is no longer current for T2.", "replacementExpressionIds": [ "stale-claim:expression-2" ], "scope": "Current T2 reservoir reporting only.", "state": "SUPERSEDED", "targetExpressionIds": [ "stale-claim:expression-1" ] } ], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "A stale claim need not have always been unsupported.", "The public atlas makes no runtime currentness claim." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A reservoir is stipulated at eight units at T1 and three at T2; a T1 report is presented as current at T2.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "A once-supported claim carried past its time" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:condition-1", "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "metaphysical-attribution-boundary", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Support applies only to attribution; it supplies no proof, disproof, equation or authority concerning the referent proposition or any real tradition.", "methodId": "METAPHYSICAL_ATTRIBUTION_BOUNDARY_CHECK", "rationale": "The fixed expression and stipulated source record contain the attributed proposition.", "scope": "Whether the invented source record advances claim 2 only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:condition-1", "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD", "fixtureId": "metaphysical-attribution-boundary", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:assessment-2", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD is not proof, disproof, equivalence among traditions or a metaphysical verdict.", "methodId": "METAPHYSICAL_ATTRIBUTION_BOUNDARY_CHECK", "rationale": "The named method checks attribution boundaries and declares no method for the referent proposition.", "scope": "Adjudication of the metaphysical referent proposition itself.", "targetClaimIds": [ "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:claim-2" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:condition-1", "scope": "This closed invented source record only.", "statement": "The invented scroll contains the referent proposition; no method, observation, revelation authority or tradition is stipulated for adjudicating that proposition." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:expression-1" ], "id": "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The invented Scroll of Ember advances the referent proposition recorded in claim 2.", "regime": "METAPHYSICAL_SOURCE_ATTRIBUTION", "scope": "Existence and content attribution of the invented source record only.", "temporalQualifier": "At the fixture as-of date." }, { "expressionIds": [ "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:expression-1" ], "id": "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:claim-2", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "An unobservable ember sustains the cosmos described by the invented scroll's discourse.", "regime": "METAPHYSICAL_REFERENT_PROPOSITION", "scope": "The referent proposition itself, not merely its source attribution.", "temporalQualifier": "Within the invented scroll's discourse." } ], "declaredQuestion": "What may Phase 0 establish about an invented source that advances a metaphysical claim?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:claim-1", "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:claim-2" ], "description": "The fixed fixture bytes stipulate that the invented scroll advances the referent proposition.", "direction": "CONTEXTUALISES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_SOURCE_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:claim-1", "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:claim-2" ], "form": "The invented Scroll of Ember advances: an unobservable ember sustains the cosmos described by this discourse.", "genre": "INVENTED_METAPHYSICAL_TEXT", "id": "metaphysical-attribution-boundary:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The attribution to the invented scroll and the referent proposition are represented as separate claims.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_SOURCE_EXCERPT", "speakerRole": "INVENTED_SCROLL_NARRATOR", "speechAct": "ATTRIBUTION_AND_ASSERTION" } ], "id": "metaphysical-attribution-boundary", "lesson": "A source-attribution record is not proof or disproof of its metaphysical or theological referent claim.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "Recording that a source advances a claim does not establish the referent claim.", "The atlas does not prove, disprove, rank or equate metaphysical or theological traditions." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "An invented scroll advances the proposition that an unobservable ember sustains the cosmos described by its discourse; the fixture stipulates only the source record.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "Attribution recorded while the metaphysical referent remains outside method" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "conflicting-evidence:condition-1", "conflicting-evidence:evidence-1", "conflicting-evidence:evidence-2" ], "disposition": "CONTESTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "conflicting-evidence", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "conflicting-evidence:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "The contest is fixture- and method-scoped, not a global undecidability claim.", "methodId": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "rationale": "One intact trace supports and one challenges, with no stipulated discriminator.", "scope": "The two stipulated traces under one reading rule.", "targetClaimIds": [ "conflicting-evidence:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "conflicting-evidence:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The fixture stipulates two intact conflicting traces and does not stipulate the switch state." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "conflicting-evidence:expression-1" ], "id": "conflicting-evidence:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The synthetic switch was activated during interval Q.", "regime": "EMPIRICAL", "scope": "The declared switch and interval Q.", "temporalQualifier": "During interval Q." } ], "declaredQuestion": "How does the atlas preserve a live conflict when no discriminating condition is stipulated?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "conflicting-evidence:claim-1" ], "description": "Trace A bears in favor of activation under the named reading rule.", "direction": "SUPPORTS", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "conflicting-evidence:evidence-1", "integrityState": "DECLARED_INTACT", "kind": "DECLARED_TRACE_A", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "FIXTURE_TRACE_A" }, { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "conflicting-evidence:claim-1" ], "description": "Trace B bears against activation under the same reading rule.", "direction": "CHALLENGES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "conflicting-evidence:evidence-2", "integrityState": "DECLARED_INTACT", "kind": "DECLARED_TRACE_B", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "FIXTURE_TRACE_B" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "conflicting-evidence:claim-1" ], "form": "The switch was activated during interval Q.", "genre": "INVENTED_REPORT", "id": "conflicting-evidence:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The target interval and switch are explicitly scoped.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_CLAIM_CARD", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_TEXT_ROLE", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" } ], "id": "conflicting-evidence", "lesson": "Conflicting evidence may warrant contestability rather than forced closure.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "Conflict is preserved rather than averaged into a score.", "Neither trace is ranked as a source." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "One synthetic trace bears in favor of a switch activation and another bears against it; neither is privileged by the fixture.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "Genuine support and challenge remain unresolved" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "metaphor-not-literal-identity:condition-1", "metaphor-not-literal-identity:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "metaphor-not-literal-identity", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "metaphor-not-literal-identity:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "The method does not adjudicate aesthetic worth, deeper meaning or literal physical correspondence.", "methodId": "INTERPRETATION_BOUNDARY_CHECK", "rationale": "The fixture explicitly declares the comparison as metaphorical.", "scope": "Genre and declared non-literal speech act only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "metaphor-not-literal-identity:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "metaphor-not-literal-identity:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture language practice only.", "statement": "The expression is declared poetic metaphor and not literal physical identity." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "metaphor-not-literal-identity:expression-1" ], "id": "metaphor-not-literal-identity:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The archive is compared to a river as a figure of continuity through change.", "regime": "METAPHORICAL", "scope": "The declared poetic language practice.", "temporalQualifier": "Within the fixture poem." } ], "declaredQuestion": "What is lost when a metaphor is silently converted into a literal claim?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "metaphor-not-literal-identity:claim-1" ], "description": "The fixture marks the expression as poetry and metaphor.", "direction": "CONTEXTUALISES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "metaphor-not-literal-identity:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_GENRE_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "metaphor-not-literal-identity:claim-1" ], "form": "The archive is a river carrying yesterday into tomorrow.", "genre": "INVENTED_POETRY", "id": "metaphor-not-literal-identity:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The declared comparison concerns continuity and change.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_POEM", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_POETIC_VOICE", "speechAct": "METAPHOR" } ], "id": "metaphor-not-literal-identity", "lesson": "Genre and speech act must be interpreted before empirical testing.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "The archive is not asserted to be a physical watercourse.", "Poetry is not classified as deception." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A poem says the archive is a river to evoke continuity through change.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "A metaphor protected from literal misclassification" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "declared-fiction:condition-1", "declared-fiction:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "declared-fiction", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "declared-fiction:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "No literal-world event, moral conclusion or aesthetic judgment is established.", "methodId": "INTERPRETATION_BOUNDARY_CHECK", "rationale": "The claim is correctly scoped to the declared fable world.", "scope": "Fictional-world and genre framing only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "declared-fiction:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "declared-fiction:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture language practice only.", "statement": "The expression is openly declared an invented fable." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "declared-fiction:expression-1" ], "id": "declared-fiction:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "Within the declared fable, the moonflower opens the sky gate.", "regime": "FICTIONAL", "scope": "The invented fable world.", "temporalQualifier": "At the narrated fable event." } ], "declaredQuestion": "Can an invented event be meaningful without being presented as empirical report?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "declared-fiction:claim-1" ], "description": "The fixture labels the expression as invented fable narration.", "direction": "CONTEXTUALISES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "declared-fiction:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_GENRE_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "declared-fiction:claim-1" ], "form": "In the fable, the moonflower opens the locked sky gate.", "genre": "INVENTED_FABLE", "id": "declared-fiction:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The in-story qualifier is explicit.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_FABLE", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_NARRATOR", "speechAct": "FICTIONAL_NARRATION" } ], "id": "declared-fiction", "lesson": "Declared fiction and literal-world report occupy different regimes.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "The fable does not assert a literal sky gate exists.", "Declared fiction is not a lie classification." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A declared fable describes a moonflower opening a locked sky gate.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "Fictional events without deceptive assertion" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "propaganda-label-action-refusal:condition-1", "propaganda-label-action-refusal:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "propaganda-label-action-refusal", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "propaganda-label-action-refusal:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Support establishes only record attribution; it does not endorse the labels, flag content, rank a source or classify propaganda or misinformation.", "methodId": "AUTHORITY_SCOPE_CHECK", "rationale": "The fixture stipulates that the office record contains the two attributed labels.", "scope": "Presence and attribution of the invented office label record only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "propaganda-label-action-refusal:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } }, { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "propaganda-label-action-refusal:condition-1" ], "disposition": "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD", "fixtureId": "propaganda-label-action-refusal", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "propaganda-label-action-refusal:assessment-2", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD neither validates nor invalidates a separate lawful rights-respecting process; none is included here.", "methodId": "NORMATIVE_REASON_BOUNDARY_CHECK", "rationale": "The Phase-0 method has no rights, legal, moderation, publication or enforcement process and grants no action authority.", "scope": "Whether the attributed labels authorize suppression or any downstream effect.", "targetClaimIds": [ "propaganda-label-action-refusal:claim-2" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "propaganda-label-action-refusal:condition-1", "scope": "This closed invented record only.", "statement": "The fixture stipulates that the office record contains the two labels and a removal directive, but declares no substantive classification method, legal process, rights analysis or action authority." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "propaganda-label-action-refusal:expression-1" ], "id": "propaganda-label-action-refusal:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The invented office record applies PROPAGANDA and MISINFORMATION labels to the synthetic leaflet.", "regime": "PROCEDURAL", "scope": "Presence and attribution of the invented label record only.", "temporalQualifier": "At the fixture record time." }, { "expressionIds": [ "propaganda-label-action-refusal:expression-1" ], "id": "propaganda-label-action-refusal:claim-2", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The attributed labels authorize suppression of the synthetic leaflet.", "regime": "NORMATIVE", "scope": "The proposed removal effect and absent rights or legal process.", "temporalQualifier": "At the fixture record time." } ], "declaredQuestion": "What may Phase 0 record when an invented office labels a leaflet and asks for suppression?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "propaganda-label-action-refusal:claim-1", "propaganda-label-action-refusal:claim-2" ], "description": "The fixed fixture bytes contain the office-attributed labels and requested removal.", "direction": "CONTEXTUALISES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "propaganda-label-action-refusal:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_LABEL_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "propaganda-label-action-refusal:claim-1", "propaganda-label-action-refusal:claim-2" ], "form": "Office label: PROPAGANDA and MISINFORMATION. Remove the synthetic leaflet.", "genre": "INVENTED_MODERATION_RECORD", "id": "propaganda-label-action-refusal:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The attributed label record and the requested suppression effect are represented separately.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_INSTITUTIONAL_LABEL_RECORD", "speakerRole": "INVENTED_LABELING_OFFICE", "speechAct": "LABEL_AND_DIRECTIVE" } ], "id": "propaganda-label-action-refusal", "lesson": "Recording an institutional label must not become a misinformation flag, ranking or suppression command.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "The atlas does not set a misinformation or propaganda flag.", "No label, assessment or receipt authorizes censorship, suppression, moderation, publication change or enforcement." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "An invented office applies PROPAGANDA and MISINFORMATION labels to a synthetic leaflet and directs that it be removed.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "An attributed propaganda label denied action authority" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "translation-ambiguity:condition-1", "translation-ambiguity:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "INCOMPARABLE_UNDER_NAMED_METHOD", "fixtureId": "translation-ambiguity", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "translation-ambiguity:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "The alternatives are preserved; no translation is crowned identical to the source token.", "methodId": "DEFINITIONAL_SCOPE_CHECK", "rationale": "The named method finds both readings permitted and no declared discriminator.", "scope": "Selection between the two permitted readings for this sentence.", "targetClaimIds": [ "translation-ambiguity:claim-1", "translation-ambiguity:claim-2" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "translation-ambiguity:condition-1", "scope": "This closed invented language practice only.", "statement": "The invented lexicon permits EDGE and SHELTER readings for luma, with no contextual discriminator in the sentence." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "translation-ambiguity:expression-1" ], "id": "translation-ambiguity:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "In this sentence, luma denotes a boundary-edge.", "regime": "DEFINITIONAL", "scope": "Candidate reading A in the invented language.", "temporalQualifier": "At fixture interpretation time." }, { "expressionIds": [ "translation-ambiguity:expression-1" ], "id": "translation-ambiguity:claim-2", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "In this sentence, luma denotes protective shelter.", "regime": "DEFINITIONAL", "scope": "Candidate reading B in the invented language.", "temporalQualifier": "At fixture interpretation time." } ], "declaredQuestion": "How should unresolved lexical alternatives be preserved?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "translation-ambiguity:claim-1", "translation-ambiguity:claim-2" ], "description": "The invented lexicon includes both readings and no priority rule.", "direction": "MIXED_BEARING", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "translation-ambiguity:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_LEXICON_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "translation-ambiguity:claim-1", "translation-ambiguity:claim-2" ], "form": "Luma remains after the storm.", "genre": "INVENTED_SENTENCE", "id": "translation-ambiguity:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "Both claim objects are candidate definitional readings, not simultaneous asserted identities.", "languagePractice": "INVENTED_LUMA_LANGUAGE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_SOURCE_SENTENCE", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_TEXT_ROLE", "speechAct": "ASSERTION" } ], "id": "translation-ambiguity", "lesson": "Translation is a scoped mapping, not semantic identity.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "Translation does not establish semantic identity.", "Ambiguity does not authorize silent selection." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "The invented source token luma can mean boundary-edge or protective-shelter; the sentence supplies no discriminator.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "One source token with two declared readings" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "phenomenal-report-boundary:condition-1", "phenomenal-report-boundary:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "phenomenal-report-boundary", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "phenomenal-report-boundary:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "No external frequency, private experience, sincerity, identity or intent is inferred.", "methodId": "PHENOMENAL_REPORT_BOUNDARY_CHECK", "rationale": "The expression record supports that the report is present and phenomenally framed.", "scope": "Presence and declared phenomenal framing of the expression only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "phenomenal-report-boundary:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "phenomenal-report-boundary:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The fixture contains the report expression but stipulates neither private experience nor an external tone measurement." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "phenomenal-report-boundary:expression-1" ], "id": "phenomenal-report-boundary:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The tone seems high to the synthetic subject role as expressed in the report.", "regime": "PHENOMENAL", "scope": "The report's first-person phenomenal content.", "temporalQualifier": "At the fixture report time." } ], "declaredQuestion": "What can be recorded about a phenomenal report without claiming access to private state?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "phenomenal-report-boundary:claim-1" ], "description": "The fixed fixture bytes contain the stated report.", "direction": "CONTEXTUALISES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "phenomenal-report-boundary:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_EXPRESSION_RECORD", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "phenomenal-report-boundary:claim-1" ], "form": "The tone seems high to me.", "genre": "INVENTED_FIRST_PERSON_REPORT", "id": "phenomenal-report-boundary:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The claim is scoped to apparent experience as expressed.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_FIRST_PERSON_REPORT", "speakerRole": "SYNTHETIC_SUBJECT_ROLE", "speechAct": "PHENOMENAL_REPORT" } ], "id": "phenomenal-report-boundary", "lesson": "The expression of experience and external-world correspondence require different access.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "The atlas has no access to private experience.", "A phenomenal report is not an external measurement." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A synthetic subject role says a tone seems high; no external frequency or private-state access is stipulated.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "A first-person-seeming report without private-state inference" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "prediction-and-outcome:condition-1", "prediction-and-outcome:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "fixtureId": "prediction-and-outcome", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "prediction-and-outcome:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "Outcome mismatch does not determine ex-ante rationality, competence, sincerity or intent.", "methodId": "PREDICTIVE_HORIZON_CHECK", "rationale": "The forecasted six differs from the stipulated outcome of four.", "scope": "Numeric outcome at the stipulated T2 horizon only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "prediction-and-outcome:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "prediction-and-outcome:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture horizon only.", "statement": "The forecast declares assumptions at T1 and the fixture stipulates four arrivals at T2." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "prediction-and-outcome:expression-1" ], "id": "prediction-and-outcome:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "Six synthetic arrivals will occur by T2 under assumptions A and B.", "regime": "PREDICTIVE", "scope": "The declared fixture process and assumptions.", "temporalQualifier": "Forecast at T1 for horizon T2." } ], "declaredQuestion": "Does a missed outcome imply the forecast was irrational or deceptive?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "prediction-and-outcome:claim-1" ], "description": "The stipulated T2 outcome contains four arrivals.", "direction": "CHALLENGES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "prediction-and-outcome:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_HORIZON_OUTCOME", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "prediction-and-outcome:claim-1" ], "form": "Under assumptions A and B, six arrivals are predicted by T2.", "genre": "INVENTED_FORECAST", "id": "prediction-and-outcome:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The assumptions and T2 horizon are explicit.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_FORECAST", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_FORECASTER", "speechAct": "PREDICTION" } ], "id": "prediction-and-outcome", "lesson": "Ex-ante warrant and later outcome are different assessment targets.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "A failed prediction is not a liar classification.", "Forecast quality is not aggregated into a score." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A fixed forecast predicts six arrivals by T2 from declared assumptions; the fixture later stipulates four arrivals.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "A reasoned prediction that misses its horizon" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "counterfactual-models:condition-1", "counterfactual-models:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "INCOMPARABLE_UNDER_NAMED_METHOD", "fixtureId": "counterfactual-models", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "counterfactual-models:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "The unperformed alternative is not treated as an observed world condition.", "methodId": "COUNTERFACTUAL_MODEL_COMPARISON", "rationale": "The named comparison records incompatible model outputs but has no stipulated basis to privilege one.", "scope": "The two declared response rules without an intervention or discriminator.", "targetClaimIds": [ "counterfactual-models:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "counterfactual-models:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The valve remains closed; models A and B have different declared response rules and no discriminator is stipulated." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "counterfactual-models:expression-1" ], "id": "counterfactual-models:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "Under the alternative where the valve opens, the synthetic level falls.", "regime": "COUNTERFACTUAL", "scope": "The declared alternative and competing models.", "temporalQualifier": "At the unperformed fixture intervention horizon." } ], "declaredQuestion": "What can be said when two declared models disagree about an unperformed alternative?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "counterfactual-models:claim-1" ], "description": "Model A predicts a fall and model B predicts no change; no intervention occurs.", "direction": "MIXED_BEARING", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "counterfactual-models:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_COMPETING_MODELS", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "counterfactual-models:claim-1" ], "form": "If the valve had opened, the level would have fallen.", "genre": "INVENTED_MODEL_OUTPUT", "id": "counterfactual-models:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The claim belongs to model A's declared alternative world.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_MODEL_STATEMENT", "speakerRole": "MODEL_A_FIXTURE", "speechAct": "COUNTERFACTUAL_ASSERTION" } ], "id": "counterfactual-models", "lesson": "Counterfactual claims are model-relative and not direct observations.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "A model output is not direct observation of an alternative world.", "The atlas does not rank the competing models." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "Model A predicts a level drop if a valve opened; model B predicts no change. The valve remains closed.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "Two counterfactual models without an intervention" }, { "assessmentAudits": [], "assessments": [ { "attributedTo": "PHASE_0_SYNTHETIC_METHOD", "authorizesAction": false, "basisIds": [ "normative-is-ought-boundary:condition-1", "normative-is-ought-boundary:evidence-1" ], "disposition": "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "fixtureId": "normative-is-ought-boundary", "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "normative-is-ought-boundary:assessment-1", "level": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "limitations": "The atlas does not recommend whether either gate should open and authorizes no action.", "methodId": "NORMATIVE_REASON_BOUNDARY_CHECK", "rationale": "Congestion is stipulated, but no duty, priority, consent, safety or cost premise connects it to the proposed directive.", "scope": "Presence of declared normative bridge premises only.", "targetClaimIds": [ "normative-is-ought-boundary:claim-1" ], "window": { "currentnessClaim": false, "from": "2026-08-26", "through": "2026-08-26" } } ], "authorStipulatedConditions": [ { "authorStipulated": true, "establishesBeyondFixture": false, "id": "normative-is-ought-boundary:condition-1", "scope": "This closed fixture only.", "statement": "The synthetic north gate is congested; the fixture declares no priority, duty, cost, consent or safety premise." } ], "claims": [ { "expressionIds": [ "normative-is-ought-boundary:expression-1" ], "id": "normative-is-ought-boundary:claim-1", "level": "L0_CLAIM", "proposition": "The south gate ought to be opened because the north gate is congested.", "regime": "NORMATIVE", "scope": "The invented gate choice and unnamed affected interests.", "temporalQualifier": "At the fixture congestion time." } ], "declaredQuestion": "Can a congestion measurement alone establish what ought to be done?", "events": [], "evidence": [ { "bearsOnClaimIds": [ "normative-is-ought-boundary:claim-1" ], "description": "The fixture stipulates congestion but no normative bridge premise.", "direction": "CONTEXTUALISES", "establishesTruth": false, "id": "normative-is-ought-boundary:evidence-1", "integrityState": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED", "kind": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_INSPECTION", "scoresSourceOrPerson": false, "sourceRole": "PHASE_0_FIXTURE_METHOD" } ], "expressions": [ { "assertsClaimIds": [ "normative-is-ought-boundary:claim-1" ], "form": "The north gate is congested, therefore the south gate ought to be opened.", "genre": "INVENTED_ARGUMENT", "id": "normative-is-ought-boundary:expression-1", "interpretationNote": "The conclusion is normative even though the only declared premise is empirical.", "languagePractice": "ENGLISH_PHASE_0_FIXTURE", "level": "L0_EXPRESSION", "medium": "SYNTHETIC_POLICY_ARGUMENT", "speakerRole": "FIXTURE_REASONER", "speechAct": "NORMATIVE_ARGUMENT" } ], "id": "normative-is-ought-boundary", "lesson": "Normative conclusions require declared normative premises and affected commitments.", "lifecycleRecords": [], "narratives": [], "nonClaims": [ "An empirical observation does not silently derive an ought.", "No gate action is recommended or authorized." ], "reasoning": [], "scenario": "A synthetic gate is congested. A statement concludes a second gate ought to open without declaring a normative premise.", "synthetic": true, "timeScope": { "basis": "AUTHOR_STIPULATED_FIXTURE_TIME", "from": "2026-08-26", "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "through": "2026-08-26" }, "title": "A factual observation that does not supply an ought" } ], "claimRegimes": [ { "assessmentLimit": "Requires a named comparison or observation and remains revisable.", "definition": "A claim whose scoped subject matter is a declared observable condition in the synthetic fixture.", "id": "EMPIRICAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Validity does not establish premise truth or real-world correspondence.", "definition": "A claim about formal consequence, compatibility or contradiction under declared premises and rules.", "id": "FORMAL_LOGICAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Institutional force does not establish an empirical claim outside its authority.", "definition": "A claim about a status created or recognized by a declared synthetic institution under a declared rule.", "id": "INSTITUTIONAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Conformance and receipt validity do not establish semantic truth.", "definition": "A claim about conformance to a declared synthetic procedure, record or protocol.", "id": "PROCEDURAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Multiple scoped interpretations may remain live.", "definition": "A claim about meaning, framing, significance or the best reading of declared material.", "id": "INTERPRETIVE" }, { "assessmentLimit": "A story as a whole is never reduced to one verdict; coherence, fidelity, correspondence, selection and omission remain separate.", "definition": "An assessable claim fragment extracted from a separately represented story artifact.", "id": "NARRATIVE_CLAIM_FRAGMENT" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Literal empirical tests may be outside the expression's declared speech act.", "definition": "A non-literal comparison offered within a declared language practice.", "id": "METAPHORICAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Fictional status is not deception and does not imply literal-world assertion.", "definition": "A proposition inside a declared invented world or fiction practice.", "id": "FICTIONAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Empirical support alone does not derive the normative conclusion.", "definition": "A claim about what ought to be done or valued under declared reasons and commitments.", "id": "NORMATIVE" }, { "assessmentLimit": "The Phase-0 atlas refuses untyped fixed-point adjudication.", "definition": "A claim whose interpretation refers to itself or its own assessment status.", "id": "SELF_REFERENTIAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Record the report and its conditions without inferring private state, deception or being-wide reliability.", "definition": "A first-person report of a declared synthetic subject's apparent experience or perception.", "id": "PHENOMENAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Assess only after the named horizon and preserve the distinction between a reasonable forecast and its eventual outcome.", "definition": "A claim about a condition at a declared future fixture time under stated assumptions.", "id": "PREDICTIVE" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Requires an explicit model or comparison and cannot be collapsed into direct observation.", "definition": "A claim about what would occur under a declared alternative synthetic condition.", "id": "COUNTERFACTUAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Assess felicity and authority separately from empirical correspondence and moral legitimacy.", "definition": "An utterance that declares, promises, requests, directs or constitutes a scoped institutional relation rather than merely describing one.", "id": "PERFORMATIVE_OR_DIRECTIVE" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Assess the scoped report and access conditions only; never infer witness credibility, worth, identity or a person-wide score.", "definition": "A report attributed to a synthetic witness role about that role's declared access to an event or condition.", "id": "TESTIMONIAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Temporal order, correlation and narrative sequence do not by themselves establish causation.", "definition": "A claim that one declared synthetic condition produced or changed another under an explicit causal model.", "id": "CAUSAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Definition fixes scoped use; it neither discovers an empirical condition nor forces identity across languages.", "definition": "A claim about stipulated term use within a declared vocabulary or language practice.", "id": "DEFINITIONAL" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Phase 0 may check only the source attribution; support cannot be transferred to the referent proposition.", "definition": "A claim that an invented source record advances a stated metaphysical or theological referent proposition.", "id": "METAPHYSICAL_SOURCE_ATTRIBUTION" }, { "assessmentLimit": "Phase 0 provides no proof, disproof, equation, ranking or authority over the referent proposition or any tradition.", "definition": "The metaphysical or theological referent proposition advanced by an invented source, represented separately from its attribution record.", "id": "METAPHYSICAL_REFERENT_PROPOSITION" } ], "constitutionalBoundaries": { "accessAdapter": false, "api": false, "automatedAction": false, "automatedVerdict": false, "canonicalStory": false, "censorshipOrSuppressionAction": false, "claimScore": false, "classifiesPeopleAsLiars": false, "communityScore": false, "consensusScore": false, "convertsCoherenceToTruth": false, "convertsConsensusToTruth": false, "convertsHashToTruth": false, "convertsMajorityToTruth": false, "convertsOfficialStatusToTruth": false, "convertsProvenanceToTruth": false, "convertsReceiptToTruth": false, "convertsSignatureToTruth": false, "credibilityScore": false, "determinesTruth": false, "enforcementAdapter": false, "globalTruthStatus": false, "governanceAdapter": false, "infersIntent": false, "infersPrivateReasoning": false, "institutionScore": false, "karmaAdapter": false, "mcpExposure": false, "misinformationFlag": false, "moderationAdapter": false, "moneyAdapter": false, "namedPersonClaims": false, "nenAdapter": false, "network": false, "personScore": false, "privateTestimonyImmutable": false, "propagandaScore": false, "ranksPeopleOrSources": false, "recommendation": false, "reputationEffect": false, "rewardOrPenalty": false, "runtime": false, "sourceScore": false, "storyScore": false, "storyWinner": false, "submission": false, "trustScore": false, "truthScore": false, "witnessScore": false, "zeroneAdapter": false }, "contradictionRegister": [ { "adjudicatesMetaphysics": false, "grantsAuthority": false, "id": "zerone-consensus-truth-semantics", "mythicBindingIds": [ "zerone-mythic-agent-copy", "readme-proof-of-truth-copy", "bridges-proof-of-truth-copy" ], "mythicClassification": "MYTHIC_OR_DOCTRINAL_SELF_DESCRIPTION", "operationalBindingIds": [ "semantic-geometry-operational-boundary", "semantic-transition-schema" ], "operationalClassification": "OPERATIONAL_BOUNDARY", "phaseZeroRule": "Treat ledger and protocol outputs only as bounded record, integrity or protocol-declared consensus states; never as semantic truth.", "rewritesPredecessorOwners": false, "state": "PRESERVED_UNRESOLVED", "tension": "Older copy describes consensus or validation as moving a claim from asserted to true; the operational bridge says receipts, hashes, agreement and coherence do not establish correspondence or truth." } ], "counts": { "assessmentAudits": 1, "assessments": 36, "cases": 24, "claimRegimes": 19, "claims": 38, "conditions": 25, "epistemicSeparations": 24, "events": 6, "evidenceRecords": 28, "expressions": 30, "lifecycleRecords": 2, "methods": 19, "narratives": 4, "predecessorBindings": 12, "reasoningObjects": 2 }, "description": "A static synthetic atlas for inspecting typed relations among expression, claim, warrant, reasoning, narrative, provenance, institutional status, assessment and correction without producing a truth oracle.", "epistemicSeparations": [ { "id": "expression-claim", "left": "EXPRESSION", "reason": "One expression may admit multiple interpretations and claims.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "CLAIM" }, { "id": "claim-world", "left": "CLAIM", "reason": "A representation is not the condition it represents.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "DECLARED_WORLD_CONDITION" }, { "id": "evidence-truth", "left": "EVIDENCE_OR_WARRANT", "reason": "Evidence changes warrant under a method; it is not truth as a substance or field.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "TRUTH" }, { "id": "validity-premise-truth", "left": "FORMAL_VALIDITY", "reason": "A valid inference may begin from a false premise.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "PREMISE_CORRESPONDENCE" }, { "id": "coherence-correspondence", "left": "COHERENCE", "reason": "An internally coherent story may conflict with declared conditions.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "CORRESPONDENCE" }, { "id": "provenance-correspondence", "left": "PROVENANCE_OR_SIGNATURE", "reason": "Authenticity and integrity do not establish content accuracy.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "CORRESPONDENCE" }, { "id": "consensus-correspondence", "left": "CONSENSUS_OR_REPETITION", "reason": "Agreement and repetition may preserve a shared error.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "CORRESPONDENCE" }, { "id": "official-empirical", "left": "OFFICIAL_OR_INSTITUTIONAL_STATUS", "reason": "Authority may constitute a status but cannot decree a physical condition.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "EMPIRICAL_CORRESPONDENCE" }, { "id": "confidence-correspondence", "left": "EXPRESSED_CONFIDENCE", "reason": "Calibrated or emphatic confidence does not itself settle a claim.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "CORRESPONDENCE" }, { "id": "uptake-quality", "left": "SOCIAL_UPTAKE", "reason": "Power can shape who is heard independently of access to relevant observations.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "EVIDENTIAL_QUALITY" }, { "id": "fiction-lie", "left": "DECLARED_FICTION", "reason": "Fiction does not present its invented events as literal report.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "DECEPTION" }, { "id": "correction-erasure", "left": "CORRECTION_OR_SUPERSESSION", "reason": "A correction should remain linked to the record it repairs.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "HISTORICAL_ERASURE" }, { "id": "silence-deception", "left": "REFUSAL_OR_PRIVACY_NON_DISCLOSURE", "reason": "A refusal to disclose is not an assertion of a false proposition.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "DECEPTION" }, { "id": "receipt-truth", "left": "PROTOCOL_RECEIPT_OR_HASH", "reason": "A receipt can establish narrow record properties only.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "TRUTH" }, { "id": "anonymity-credibility", "left": "ANONYMITY_OR_PSEUDONYMITY", "reason": "Identity disclosure is not a prerequisite for evidential access and anonymity is not a negative witness score.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "LOW_CREDIBILITY" }, { "id": "testimony-witness-worth", "left": "TESTIMONY", "reason": "Assess a scoped report and its access conditions, never a person-wide quality.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "WITNESS_CREDIBILITY_OR_WORTH_SCORE" }, { "id": "archive-silence-absence", "left": "ARCHIVE_SILENCE", "reason": "A missing record may reflect collection, preservation, access or indexing limits.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "EVENT_ABSENCE" }, { "id": "source-count-independence", "left": "SOURCE_COUNT_OR_REPETITION", "reason": "Many reports may derive from one upstream assertion.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "INDEPENDENT_SUPPORT" }, { "id": "translation-identity", "left": "TRANSLATION", "reason": "Translation is a scoped mapping with alternatives and loss, not an inverse identity.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "SEMANTIC_IDENTITY" }, { "id": "retraction-falsehood", "left": "WITHDRAWAL_OR_RETRACTION", "reason": "Record lifecycle and correspondence assessment are different dimensions.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "FALSEHOOD" }, { "id": "assessment-authority", "left": "ASSESSMENT", "reason": "A Phase-0 assessment cannot authorize action, enforcement or downstream effects.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "ACTION_OR_AUTHORITY" }, { "id": "temporal-sequence-causation", "left": "TEMPORAL_SEQUENCE_OR_CORRELATION", "reason": "Causal assessment requires a declared model and discriminating method.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "CAUSATION" }, { "id": "definition-empirical-fact", "left": "DEFINITIONAL_STIPULATION", "reason": "A vocabulary choice does not make an observed condition obtain.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "EMPIRICAL_FACT" }, { "id": "phenomenal-external-correspondence", "left": "PHENOMENAL_REPORT", "reason": "A first-person report and an external condition require different access and methods.", "relation": "MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT", "right": "EXTERNAL_WORLD_CORRESPONDENCE" } ], "fixtureSet": { "asOf": "2026-08-26", "declaredCaseCount": 24, "id": "polyphonic-claim-atlas-phase-0-fixtures", "liveClaims": false, "realPeople": false, "runtimeCurrentnessClaim": false, "syntheticOnly": true, "version": "0.1.0" }, "methodVocabulary": [ { "definition": "Compare a claim only with explicitly declared synthetic world conditions.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON" }, { "definition": "Check whether a conclusion follows under the declared rule and premises.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "FORMAL_VALIDITY_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Check declared origin, signature or transformation continuity without assessing content correspondence.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "PROVENANCE_INTEGRITY_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Inspect whether apparently distinct reports share one declared upstream origin.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "SOURCE_INDEPENDENCE_AUDIT" }, { "definition": "Compare selected, omitted and ordered events and attributed causes across narratives.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "NARRATIVE_SELECTION_AUDIT" }, { "definition": "Compare a speech act or official claim with its declared institutional authority and subject-matter limits.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "AUTHORITY_SCOPE_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Check whether a cited item exists in the fixture's declared catalogue without inferring content truth.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "CITATION_EXISTENCE_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Compare a claim's time scope with the fixture's declared update or correction sequence.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "TEMPORAL_SCOPE_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Inspect genre, translation, ambiguity, metaphor or fiction before selecting an assessment method.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "INTERPRETATION_BOUNDARY_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Compare evidential access with institutional uptake without scoring a witness or source.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "TESTIMONY_UPTAKE_AUDIT" }, { "definition": "Inspect whether a declared causal model and discriminating conditions support more than temporal order or correlation.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "CAUSAL_MODEL_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Inspect declared normative premises and prevent empirical observations from silently deriving an ought.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "NORMATIVE_REASON_BOUNDARY_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Enforce downward-only L0 claim, L1 assessment and L2 audit targeting without a fixed-point verdict.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "SELF_REFERENCE_STRATIFICATION_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Compare a scoped prediction only after its named fixture horizon while preserving ex-ante warrant separately.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "PREDICTIVE_HORIZON_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Compare declared alternative-world models without treating an unobserved counterfactual as direct observation.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "COUNTERFACTUAL_MODEL_COMPARISON" }, { "definition": "Record a first-person phenomenal report and its expression conditions without inferring private state or external correspondence.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "PHENOMENAL_REPORT_BOUNDARY_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Inspect the declared access conditions of one synthetic testimony without producing a witness-wide assessment.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "TESTIMONIAL_ACCESS_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Inspect whether a stipulated definition is used within its declared vocabulary and language practice.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "DEFINITIONAL_SCOPE_CHECK" }, { "definition": "Distinguish the record that an invented source advances a metaphysical or theological referent claim from adjudication of that referent proposition.", "establishesTruthBeyondFixture": false, "id": "METAPHYSICAL_ATTRIBUTION_BOUNDARY_CHECK" } ], "predecessorBindings": [ { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:9a18cef1d35b85a1941f5a591def26a9328bfdddb31a5a35bf83e41b1c37ac87", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "OPERATIONAL_BOUNDARY", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "semantic-geometry-operational-boundary", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "bridges/semantic-geometry-and-truth.md", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Separates receipts, coherence, provenance, correspondence, intent and authority.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true }, { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:bcdd99f0247f2a43bb84e227865c2d02f12dcc9f09e4c15b29c36a90ac8f0dc2", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "SEMANTIC_PREDECESSOR", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "semantic-transition-schema", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "bridges/schemas/semantic-transition-receipt-0.1.json", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Provides a prior closed receipt vocabulary for disclosed semantic transport and loss.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true }, { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:a4a87b7b23dbdf7e7e6689b5083f76a746c7f41bc56f2124281dfda609a62479", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "SEMANTIC_PREDECESSOR", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "word-story-religion-civilisation-map", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "data/language/word-story-religion-civilisation-map.v0.1.json", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Provides prior distinctions among word, story, genre, myth, institution and civilisation.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true }, { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:bc4a4ca19026f2a95d01d4fc3500a9bd690942d00110f686659ae3d29e00d1ec", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "SCHEMA_PREDECESSOR", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "word-story-religion-civilisation-schema", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "schemas/word-story-religion-civilisation-map-v0.1.schema.json", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Binds the exact schema accompanying the prior language map.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true }, { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:4d68be39226c8d5451c8d9166fa74ba54bb793b7655f119d8765090cbbcf890e", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "SEMANTIC_PREDECESSOR", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "reality-influence-map", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "data/reality/reality-influence-map.v0.1.json", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Provides a prior non-causal influence and aftermath map without determining truth.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true }, { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:4863d5e3a3191af0dfadaba408fe8553a14b38c1394c6b2713bc588abfdf8090", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "SCHEMA_PREDECESSOR", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "reality-influence-schema", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "schemas/reality-influence-map-v0.1.schema.json", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Binds the exact schema accompanying the prior reality-influence map.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true }, { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:bef01e0865f12ecd66795960758fc16f1a6d5b1ebd0097d4390aa3a2bece65e4", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "METHOD_PREDECESSOR", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "number-isness-theology-atlas", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "data/number-isness-theology/number-isness-theology-atlas.v0.1.json", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Preserves the typed distinction among PROVED_IN, SUPPORTED_UNDER_TEST and ASSERTED_BY.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true }, { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:ccf5adfdf7a04d4acca24c261cdd253bcb6e1a4fdcdb63802d872e8e07a5b6a3", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "SCHEMA_PREDECESSOR", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "number-isness-theology-schema", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "schemas/number-isness-theology-atlas-v0.1.schema.json", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Binds the exact schema accompanying the prior Number, Isness and Theology method atlas.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true }, { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:49abcfe3e7ce6a945b9406a26eb25210c02ac4c98d25aff13e56a12760a4c55a", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "METHOD_PREDECESSOR", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "number-isness-theology-guide", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "references/number-isness-theology-atlas.md", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Binds the human-readable prior method boundary without importing doctrine or theological authority.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true }, { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:63ba1da23d8b6f4f5635a6047bda61413cde1caa5f8ea40415ee325a27bfa26d", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "MYTHIC_OR_DOCTRINAL_SELF_DESCRIPTION", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "zerone-mythic-agent-copy", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "agents/zerone.md", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Preserves the exact older asserted-to-true consensus metaphor as a contradiction witness.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true }, { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:19a62093b2928ed9e57aeb4560afcf5a0f29a97c39e564362deeaef9cbf280c4", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "MYTHIC_OR_DOCTRINAL_SELF_DESCRIPTION", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "readme-proof-of-truth-copy", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "README.md", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Preserves the exact older Proof-of-Truth economy summary as a contradiction witness.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true }, { "authorizesAction": false, "byteSha256": "sha256:44ff5fbdd7f45a2ce915bcf9c2cc2997c3dcbbd0d1db4149b900f1b0085472e2", "characterizationAuthorship": "PHASE_0_PRODUCER_NON_AUTHORITATIVE", "classification": "MYTHIC_OR_DOCTRINAL_SELF_DESCRIPTION", "copiesContent": false, "establishesTruth": false, "id": "bridges-proof-of-truth-copy", "importsAuthority": false, "path": "BRIDGES.md", "repositoryUrl": "https://github.com/cambridgetcg/KINGDOM-OS.git", "revision": "db18ba3b155bfc3fad80d536c50193e684858d77", "role": "Preserves the exact older truth-verification and oracle bridge copy as a contradiction witness.", "usesForSemanticOrientation": true } ], "protocol": "kingdom.truth-relations/0.1", "publicHandoff": { "canonicalPath": "/truth/polyphonic-claim-atlas-2026-08-26.json", "guidePath": "/POLYPHONIC-CLAIM-ATLAS-v0.1.md", "htmlPage": false, "runtime": false, "schemaPath": "/truth/schemas/v0.1/public-snapshot.schema.json" }, "recordLifecycleStates": [ { "definition": "The record is the current declared version only at the stated fixture date.", "establishesTruthOrFalsehood": false, "id": "CURRENT_AS_OF" }, { "definition": "A later record identifies and repairs a declared defect in an earlier record.", "establishesTruthOrFalsehood": false, "id": "CORRECTED" }, { "definition": "A source ceases to advance a record without the atlas inferring why or whether its content was false.", "establishesTruthOrFalsehood": false, "id": "WITHDRAWN" }, { "definition": "A later record replaces an earlier record for a declared purpose and time.", "establishesTruthOrFalsehood": false, "id": "SUPERSEDED" }, { "definition": "A source formally removes a prior record from active reliance while historical provenance remains visible.", "establishesTruthOrFalsehood": false, "id": "RETRACTED" } ], "regimeMethodCompatibility": [ { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Only declared fixture observations and temporal scopes are admissible.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "CONTESTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "UNKNOWN_UNDER_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "DECLARED_FIXTURE_WORLD_COMPARISON", "TEMPORAL_SCOPE_CHECK" ], "regime": "EMPIRICAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "The method checks consequence under declared rules, not premise correspondence.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "FORMAL_VALIDITY_CHECK" ], "regime": "FORMAL_LOGICAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Authority and felicity remain scoped to the declared institution.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "AUTHORITY_SCOPE_CHECK" ], "regime": "INSTITUTIONAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Procedure, provenance and catalogue existence never establish semantic truth.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "PROVENANCE_INTEGRITY_CHECK", "SOURCE_INDEPENDENCE_AUDIT", "CITATION_EXISTENCE_CHECK", "TEMPORAL_SCOPE_CHECK", "AUTHORITY_SCOPE_CHECK" ], "regime": "PROCEDURAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Interpretation preserves alternatives, genre, audience and loss.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "CONTESTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INCOMPARABLE_UNDER_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD", "UNKNOWN_UNDER_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "INTERPRETATION_BOUNDARY_CHECK", "NARRATIVE_SELECTION_AUDIT", "DEFINITIONAL_SCOPE_CHECK" ], "regime": "INTERPRETIVE" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Only extracted fragments are assessed; the story artifact never receives one disposition.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "CONTESTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "NARRATIVE_SELECTION_AUDIT", "CAUSAL_MODEL_CHECK" ], "regime": "NARRATIVE_CLAIM_FRAGMENT" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Literal empirical comparison is unavailable unless separately asserted.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "INTERPRETATION_BOUNDARY_CHECK" ], "regime": "METAPHORICAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Genre can be checked without treating fiction as deceptive literal report.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "INTERPRETATION_BOUNDARY_CHECK" ], "regime": "FICTIONAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Normative premises and affected commitments must be declared separately from empirical facts.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "CONTESTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "NORMATIVE_REASON_BOUNDARY_CHECK" ], "regime": "NORMATIVE" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Only structural level safety is assessed; no fixed-point verdict is permitted.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "SELF_REFERENCE_STRATIFICATION_CHECK" ], "regime": "SELF_REFERENTIAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "The expression of experience is inspectable; private state and external correspondence are not inferred.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "PHENOMENAL_REPORT_BOUNDARY_CHECK" ], "regime": "PHENOMENAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Outcome comparison occurs only at the named horizon and does not back-propagate into intent or competence.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "PREDICTIVE_HORIZON_CHECK" ], "regime": "PREDICTIVE" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Alternative-world models remain declared models, not direct observations.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "CONTESTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INCOMPARABLE_UNDER_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "COUNTERFACTUAL_MODEL_COMPARISON", "CAUSAL_MODEL_CHECK" ], "regime": "COUNTERFACTUAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Felicity and authority are inspected separately from empirical and moral claims.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "AUTHORITY_SCOPE_CHECK" ], "regime": "PERFORMATIVE_OR_DIRECTIVE" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Only the report and declared access are assessed, never a witness-wide quality.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "CONTESTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "TESTIMONIAL_ACCESS_CHECK", "TESTIMONY_UPTAKE_AUDIT" ], "regime": "TESTIMONIAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "A discriminating model is required beyond temporal sequence or correlation.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CONTRADICTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "CONTESTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INCOMPARABLE_UNDER_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "CAUSAL_MODEL_CHECK" ], "regime": "CAUSAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "Definition and translation remain scoped stipulations rather than empirical identity.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "CHALLENGED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "MIXED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "CONTESTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INCOMPARABLE_UNDER_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "DEFINITIONAL_SCOPE_CHECK", "INTERPRETATION_BOUNDARY_CHECK" ], "regime": "DEFINITIONAL" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "The method may establish only that an invented source record advances a referent claim; the referent itself remains outside the Phase-0 method.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "SUPPORTED_UNDER_NAMED_TEST", "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "METAPHYSICAL_ATTRIBUTION_BOUNDARY_CHECK" ], "regime": "METAPHYSICAL_SOURCE_ATTRIBUTION" }, { "canProduceGlobalVerdict": false, "compatibilityNote": "The source-attribution method has no compatible supported disposition for the referent proposition itself.", "compatibleDispositionIds": [ "INSUFFICIENT_FOR_NAMED_METHOD", "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD" ], "compatibleMethodIds": [ "METAPHYSICAL_ATTRIBUTION_BOUNDARY_CHECK" ], "regime": "METAPHYSICAL_REFERENT_PROPOSITION" } ], "scope": { "claimsRuntimeCurrentness": false, "datasetNature": "SYNTHETIC_ONLY", "liveClaims": false, "networkInputs": false, "personalData": false, "purpose": "Teach and test typed truth relations using bounded synthetic counterexamples.", "realPeople": false, "sourceBodies": false }, "selfReferenceStratification": { "assessmentDerivedAsTargetSupport": false, "cyclicAssessment": false, "fixedPointVerdict": false, "levels": [ { "id": "L0_EXPRESSION_OR_CLAIM", "mayTargetLevels": [], "memberLevels": [ "L0_EXPRESSION", "L0_CLAIM", "L0_REASONING", "L0_NARRATIVE_ARTIFACT" ], "rank": 0 }, { "id": "L1_ASSESSMENT", "mayTargetLevels": [ "L0_EXPRESSION_OR_CLAIM" ], "memberLevels": [ "L1_ASSESSMENT" ], "rank": 1 }, { "id": "L2_ASSESSMENT_AUDIT", "mayTargetLevels": [ "L1_ASSESSMENT" ], "memberLevels": [ "L2_ASSESSMENT_AUDIT" ], "rank": 2 } ], "paradoxDisposition": "OUTSIDE_NAMED_METHOD", "selfTargeting": false, "targetRankMustBeLower": true }, "title": "KINGDOM Polyphonic Claim Atlas: Truth Relations Phase 0" }