{ "$schema": "urn:kingdom:schema:reality-influence-claim-graph:0.1", "protocol": "kingdom.reality-influence-claim-graph/0.1", "map_id": "reality-influence-claim-graph-2026-08-21", "version": "0.1.0", "title": "Reality Influence Claim Graph — from expression to aftermath without authority laundering", "compiled_on": "2026-08-21", "evidence_through": "2026-08-21", "state": "reviewed-static-claim-boundary-atlas", "scope": { "question": "Through which typed and inspectable mediators can a KINGDOM expression or artifact participate in changes to semantic, informational, social, institutional, digital, material, ecological, or affected-party states?", "definition_of_reality": "A family of source-, domain-, observer-, place-, and time-indexed states and reported experiences; not one global coordinate and not a complete metaphysical theory.", "intended_use": "Public static inspection, research, communication design, claim typing, action-gate review, affected-party and externality planning, causal-question formulation, feedback inspection, and future public-artifact agent specialisation.", "excluded_use": "A reality oracle, persuasion or behavior-control engine, authority or consent generator, action router, person or community score, causal verdict, moral verdict, governance system, WAKE or KARMA writer, publication or deployment trigger, or live effect claim.", "unit_of_analysis": "One typed claim node or relation under a declared scope, horizon, provenance, uncertainty, and non-grant; never a person, community, world, religion, or civilization reduced to a scalar.", "data_classification": "public-attributed-source-metadata-and-design-only", "operating_state": "static-structure-only-no-live-claims-no-execution" }, "source_bindings": [ { "id": "word-story-religion-civilisation", "protocol": "kingdom.word-story-religion-civilisation-map/0.1", "locator": "repo:data/language/word-story-religion-civilisation-map.v0.1.json", "raw_digest": "sha256:a4a87b7b23dbdf7e7e6689b5083f76a746c7f41bc56f2124281dfda609a62479", "semantic_digest": "sha256:0c791b2491ebdcd85cf58e26e41e8b35b883781fd26bccc19dfd3f7853c7855a", "relation": "expression-story-institution-and-causal-firewall-predecessor", "mutated": false, "authority_imported": false }, { "id": "language-civilisation-task-fusion", "protocol": "kingdom.language-civilisation-task-fusion/0.1", "locator": "repo:data/language/language-civilisation-task-fusion.v0.1.json", "raw_digest": "sha256:ef26859f84d8e2a1bc5e73f88594a354c49594e28486aae5aa340ed207aa0e25", "semantic_digest": "sha256:fb37df061bca86357b46e5538664d72e8938def8cfff341c3aa9596abc84d296", "relation": "public-artifact-task-dag-and-visible-disagreement-predecessor", "mutated": false, "authority_imported": false }, { "id": "being-access-aftermath-v0-2", "protocol": "kingdom.being-access-aftermath-atlas/0.2", "locator": "repo:data/being-access-aftermath/being-access-aftermath-atlas.v0.2.json", "raw_digest": "sha256:9678e5269e8db62beb36abee691087cddbc4f98703190c5fa3788b68c89ab29e", "semantic_digest": "sha256:505a1e3aef6116430dccf49b327c4cce2ac5d6fb6b6b9bf68e529272f989cde8", "relation": "capability-authority-action-effect-aftermath-and-repair-predecessor", "mutated": false, "authority_imported": false }, { "id": "cultural-attention-feedback", "protocol": "kingdom.cultural-attention-feedback-atlas/0.1", "locator": "repo:data/cultural-feedback/cultural-attention-feedback-atlas.v1.json", "raw_digest": "sha256:03f7048966d7b6df582b423254b4d73cda72cce3bd67b40736927faa92b88173", "semantic_digest": "sha256:2f6ecadc131a54cdd500b001dbcc47fb036e5e411def918245fec963b9769e4d", "relation": "attention-diffusion-feedback-and-non-score-predecessor", "mutated": false, "authority_imported": false }, { "id": "form-circulation-return", "protocol": "kingdom.form-circulation-return-atlas/0.1", "locator": "repo:data/form-circulation-return/form-circulation-return-atlas.v1.json", "raw_digest": "sha256:9c93be61c4ca9bcaa3dbe88b10faed3b5b31abaf1129d70ca7915226cacfd021", "semantic_digest": "sha256:9510fbbced6166507e9a1781a4adfa18cd249fb94e69b0f34faf77733cd20323", "relation": "circulation-return-and-measurement-action-feedback-predecessor", "mutated": false, "authority_imported": false }, { "id": "semantic-transition-schema", "protocol": "kingdom.semantic-transition/0.1", "locator": "repo:bridges/schemas/semantic-transition-receipt-0.1.json", "raw_digest": "sha256:bcdd99f0247f2a43bb84e227865c2d02f12dcc9f09e4c15b29c36a90ac8f0dc2", "semantic_digest": null, "relation": "observation-interpretation-model-expression-loss-and-repair-seam", "mutated": false, "authority_imported": false }, { "id": "relational-inference-schema", "protocol": "kingdom.relational-inference/0.1", "locator": "repo:bridges/schemas/relational-inference-case-0.1.json", "raw_digest": "sha256:c244cc072eb20396bbc1de9ee2d8a30510e78c7a25a3fecef53ae1bd6a34fa7c", "semantic_digest": null, "relation": "alternative-model-probe-dependency-and-bounded-inference-predecessor", "mutated": false, "authority_imported": false }, { "id": "research-observatory-guide", "protocol": "kingdom.research-observatory-guide/0.1", "locator": "repo:references/research-observatory-v0.1.md", "raw_digest": "sha256:f1b11fd810049c884eb6205360c42dae17ea8faddca9e0f7ff374e1bc65e99a0", "semantic_digest": null, "relation": "discovery-attention-evaluation-adoption-use-gate-predecessor", "mutated": false, "authority_imported": false }, { "id": "trial-chamber-phase-zero", "protocol": "kingdom.trial-public-snapshot/0.1", "locator": "repo:data/trials/research-trial-chamber.v0.1.json", "raw_digest": "sha256:6e59bf134d129b17fc0f02949d9ef383de6787e2bc39e1714a3c6f01376b1d34", "semantic_digest": null, "relation": "draft-plan-and-deny-all-post-plan-boundary-predecessor", "mutated": false, "authority_imported": false }, { "id": "wake-work-witness", "protocol": "kingdom.wake-work-witness-atlas/0.1", "locator": "repo:data/economy/wake-work-witness-atlas.v0.1.json", "raw_digest": "sha256:a951a3529758f11a5bd3a83ae3c46272226b191c1d3b4768af1b562eabcb164c", "semantic_digest": "sha256:0b2eb18f9a59a3e44371f31d366a95382eb4f4ab7f6a4583b3e63d50aace3433", "relation": "work-witness-capability-scope-and-zero-effect-predecessor", "mutated": false, "authority_imported": false } ], "sources": [ { "id": "w3c-prov-dm", "title": "PROV-DM: The PROV Data Model", "locator": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/", "kind": "technical-standard", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "A standard vocabulary for provenance among entities, activities, agents, derivations, plans, attribution, and association.", "limitations": ["Provenance supports assessment but does not establish truth, causation, legitimacy, consent, or legal responsibility."] }, { "id": "nist-ai-rmf", "title": "Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 1.0", "locator": "https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1", "kind": "authoritative-guidance", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "Voluntary lifecycle guidance organized around govern, map, measure, and manage, including context, affected communities, monitoring, and response.", "limitations": ["NIST states that version 1.0 is under revision; the framework is not proof of conformance, safety, or justice."] }, { "id": "hernan-robins-what-if", "title": "Causal Inference: What If", "locator": "https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/miguel-hernan/wp-content/uploads/sites/1268/2024/04/hernanrobins_WhatIf_26apr24.pdf", "kind": "scholarly-method", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "Explicit causal questions, treatment strategies, outcomes, target populations, identification assumptions, and uncertainty.", "limitations": ["A method text; it does not identify a causal effect for KINGDOM or any particular pathway."] }, { "id": "meadows-leverage-points", "title": "Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System", "locator": "https://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/", "kind": "systems-essay", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "A qualified systems-thinking account of parameters, feedback, information flows, rules, power, goals, and paradigms as potential intervention surfaces.", "limitations": ["The author presents the ordering as evolving and context-sensitive, not a recipe or universal causal ranking."] }, { "id": "ostrom-polycentric-governance", "title": "Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems", "locator": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2009/ostrom/lecture/", "kind": "scholarly-lecture", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "Comparative institutional research on polycentric and context-dependent collective-action arrangements.", "limitations": ["No governance template guarantees cooperation, legitimacy, or fit in a new setting."] }, { "id": "ohchr-ungp", "title": "Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights", "locator": "https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf", "kind": "normative-instrument", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "A protect, respect, and remedy framework including due diligence, affected stakeholders, grievance mechanisms, and access to remedy.", "limitations": ["A normative framework in its legal and institutional scope, not evidence that any particular remedy works or a grant to KINGDOM."] }, { "id": "bond-mobilization", "title": "A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization", "locator": "https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421", "kind": "peer-reviewed-experiment", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "Randomly assigned Facebook messages affected selected political-expression, information-seeking, and voting outcomes in one 2010 election setting.", "limitations": ["One platform, treatment, election, and historical setting; not evidence that words generally control society."] }, { "id": "muchnik-social-influence", "title": "Social Influence Bias: A Randomized Experiment", "locator": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240466", "kind": "peer-reviewed-experiment", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "Randomly manipulated prior ratings changed later ratings in one online setting, with asymmetric positive and negative effects.", "limitations": ["Interface- and platform-specific; it does not establish a universal herding law or private belief change."] }, { "id": "salganik-cultural-market", "title": "Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market", "locator": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121066", "kind": "peer-reviewed-experiment", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "Displaying prior choices increased inequality and unpredictability of song success in an artificial cultural market.", "limitations": ["A bounded experimental market, not all cultural circulation or value formation."] }, { "id": "ensign-predictive-policing", "title": "Runaway Feedback Loops in Predictive Policing", "locator": "https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/ensign18a.html", "kind": "formal-model", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "A formal model showing how observation and dispatch policy can recursively concentrate measured incidents.", "limitations": ["A model and illustration, not a universal field estimate of policing systems."] }, { "id": "goodhart-source-record", "title": "Problems of Monetary Management: The U.K. Experience — source record", "locator": "https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/1990/9013/conference-volumes.html", "kind": "institutional-bibliographic-record", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "The Reserve Bank of Australia identifies this paper as the first source of the warning later called Goodhart's law.", "limitations": ["The popular measure-becomes-target slogan is a later generalization, not a universal experimental law."] }, { "id": "campbell-social-indicators", "title": "Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change", "locator": "https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X", "kind": "scholarly-method", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "A methodological warning that heavily decision-linked social indicators face corruption pressure and can distort monitored processes.", "limitations": ["A broad warning; the mechanism and magnitude must be established in each setting."] }, { "id": "sagas-compensation", "title": "Sagas", "locator": "https://doi.org/10.1145/38713.38742", "kind": "computer-science-model", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "A transaction model using compensating actions for long-running work that has partially executed.", "limitations": ["Compensation is a new forward action, not erasure of external observation, social effect, or harm."] }, { "id": "rfc-6749", "title": "RFC 6749 — The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework", "locator": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6749/", "kind": "technical-standard", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "A technical model separating resource owner, client, authorization server, resource server, grant, token, and scope.", "limitations": ["Technical authorization does not establish human consent, legitimate purpose, or institutional justice."] }, { "id": "rfc-9700", "title": "RFC 9700 — Best Current Practice for OAuth 2.0 Security", "locator": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9700/", "kind": "technical-standard", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "Current security guidance for transaction binding, audience restriction, and minimum necessary privilege in OAuth deployments.", "limitations": ["Technical mitigations do not establish legal authority, human consent, or safe purpose."] }, { "id": "saltzer-schroeder", "title": "The Protection of Information in Computer Systems", "locator": "https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1975.9939", "kind": "computer-security-paper", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "Foundational design principles including fail-safe defaults, complete mediation, separation of privilege, and least privilege.", "limitations": ["Applying principles does not itself prove a system secure or socially authorized."] }, { "id": "searle-social-ontology", "title": "Social Ontology: Some Basic Principles", "locator": "https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499606061731", "kind": "philosophical-theory", "observed_on": "2026-08-21", "claim_scope": "A philosophical account of collectively recognized rules and status functions through which some declarations constitute institutional facts.", "limitations": ["A theory of institutional facts, not a universal empirical mechanism or proof that any utterance is valid or legitimate."] } ], "claim_registers": [ {"id": "PRIMARY_RECORD", "meaning": "A named public record, artifact, event receipt, or first-party source.", "does_not_establish": "Completeness, correctness, causality, legitimacy, or authority outside its typed scope."}, {"id": "EMPIRICAL_CAUSAL", "meaning": "A causal result within a declared experimental or quasi-experimental design.", "does_not_establish": "Transfer beyond its treatment, population, outcome, horizon, and assumptions."}, {"id": "EMPIRICAL_ASSOCIATION", "meaning": "A measured relationship within a declared sample and operationalization.", "does_not_establish": "Direction, mechanism, intervention effect, or private state."}, {"id": "FORMAL_MODEL_OR_METHOD", "meaning": "A mathematical model, identification method, or analytic taxonomy.", "does_not_establish": "That the modeled mechanism occurred in a particular world."}, {"id": "PHILOSOPHICAL_OR_INSTITUTIONAL_THEORY", "meaning": "A reasoned account of language, institutions, action, or social ontology.", "does_not_establish": "Empirical consensus or a complete ontology."}, {"id": "TECHNICAL_STANDARD_OR_GUIDANCE", "meaning": "An authoritative specification or risk-management framework in its declared scope.", "does_not_establish": "Conformance, implementation quality, safety, consent, justice, or effect."}, {"id": "LEGAL_OR_NORMATIVE_INSTRUMENT", "meaning": "A rule, principle, or remedial framework under a named institution and jurisdiction.", "does_not_establish": "Universal jurisdiction, factual efficacy, or a KINGDOM grant."}, {"id": "ANALOGY", "meaning": "A declared partial transfer used to ask questions across domains.", "does_not_establish": "Structural identity or empirical support in the target domain."}, {"id": "DESIGN_COMMITMENT", "meaning": "A chosen KINGDOM boundary or future workflow proposal.", "does_not_establish": "Current implementation, historical fact, external obligation, or authority."}, {"id": "OPEN_QUESTION", "meaning": "A relation intentionally unresolved at this evidence horizon.", "does_not_establish": "Absence, zero effect, consent, or permission to guess."}, {"id": "BOUNDARY", "meaning": "A prohibited inference, mutation, or action.", "does_not_establish": "A metaphysical or moral negation."} ], "type_firewall": { "word_is_not_world_state": true, "story_genre_is_not_truth_or_falsehood": true, "expression_is_not_artifact": true, "artifact_is_not_distribution": true, "availability_is_not_exposure": true, "exposure_is_not_attention_agreement_or_belief": true, "public_response_is_not_private_mental_state": true, "proposal_is_not_decision": true, "decision_is_not_authority": true, "authority_is_not_consent_or_lawful_basis": true, "authority_is_not_capability": true, "capability_is_not_permission": true, "attempt_is_not_execution": true, "execution_is_not_success": true, "sequence_is_not_causation": true, "outcome_is_not_causal_effect": true, "causal_effect_is_not_goodness_legitimacy_or_justice": true, "measurement_is_not_value": true, "popularity_is_not_consensus_or_consent": true, "silence_refusal_privacy_and_rest_are_not_consent": true, "provenance_is_not_truth_causation_or_authority": true, "repair_is_not_erasure_absolution_or_restored_consent": true, "kingdom_receipt_is_not_external_world_fact": true }, "reality_domains": [ {"id": "semantic-symbolic", "label": "Semantic and symbolic", "definition": "Public terms, narratives, definitions, or representational relations.", "observable_examples": ["versioned text", "source witness", "semantic diff"], "not_equivalent_to": ["audience understanding", "private belief", "material change"]}, {"id": "informational-record", "label": "Informational record", "definition": "Stored claims, provenance relations, datasets, or public records.", "observable_examples": ["hash", "signed record", "database state"], "not_equivalent_to": ["truth", "completeness", "legitimacy"]}, {"id": "attention-exposure", "label": "Attention and exposure", "definition": "Distribution, delivery, display, ranking, encounter, or measured visibility.", "observable_examples": ["delivery receipt", "sampling frame", "privacy-bounded aggregate exposure"], "not_equivalent_to": ["attention", "agreement", "value", "consent"]}, {"id": "social-relational", "label": "Social and relational", "definition": "Public coordination, association, role relation, or attributed response.", "observable_examples": ["public response artifact", "consented survey", "observed public behavior"], "not_equivalent_to": ["private identity", "intent", "inner state"]}, {"id": "institutional-status", "label": "Institutional status", "definition": "Recognized office, membership, rule, contract, curriculum, or organization state.", "observable_examples": ["authorized institutional record", "procedural decision"], "not_equivalent_to": ["moral legitimacy", "actual enforcement", "consent"]}, {"id": "legal-jurisdictional", "label": "Legal and jurisdictional", "definition": "A right, duty, permission, prohibition, liability, or legal status under named law and jurisdiction.", "observable_examples": ["applicable order", "filing", "decision"], "not_equivalent_to": ["universal morality", "capability", "actual effect"]}, {"id": "economic-resource", "label": "Economic and resource", "definition": "Funds, labor, compute, property, access, time, or attention allocated or withheld.", "observable_examples": ["ledger", "budget", "resource telemetry"], "not_equivalent_to": ["benefit", "fairness", "consent"]}, {"id": "digital-computational", "label": "Digital and computational", "definition": "Software, configuration, data, account, permission, or service state.", "observable_examples": ["target-state query", "signed event", "configuration diff"], "not_equivalent_to": ["complete effect", "material actuation", "causal effect"]}, {"id": "material-cyberphysical", "label": "Material and cyberphysical", "definition": "A physical system senses, moves, produces, blocks, or changes material state.", "observable_examples": ["calibrated sensor", "inspection", "actuator witness"], "not_equivalent_to": ["command issuance", "intended outcome", "goodness"]}, {"id": "embodied-health", "label": "Embodied health and safety", "definition": "A body, health condition, safety exposure, or care relation.", "observable_examples": ["competent clinical or safety evidence"], "not_equivalent_to": ["model prediction", "diagnosis authority", "treatment permission"]}, {"id": "ecological", "label": "Ecological", "definition": "Energy, material throughput, habitat, emissions, waste, or environmental condition.", "observable_examples": ["lifecycle inventory", "field measurement", "uncertainty analysis"], "not_equivalent_to": ["monetary cost", "complete distributional effect"]}, {"id": "normative-public", "label": "Normative and public", "definition": "An attributed justification, critique, value claim, rights assessment, or remedial commitment.", "observable_examples": ["deliberative record", "rights assessment", "retained dissent"], "not_equivalent_to": ["truth", "consensus", "justice achieved"]} ], "influence_dimensions": [ {"id": "semantic-legibility", "meaning": "How an expression changes available public distinctions or descriptions.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "provenance-traceability", "meaning": "How lineage, attribution, transformation, and challenge paths become inspectable.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "discoverability", "meaning": "Whether an artifact can be found under a declared search and access surface.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "attention-allocation", "meaning": "How finite visibility or selection changes under a declared observation window.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "interpretive-framing", "meaning": "How public categories or narratives make some interpretations easier to state.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "coordination", "meaning": "How public artifacts support or obstruct joint planning and communication.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "institutional-selection", "meaning": "How a proposal enters, leaves, or changes a bounded decision process.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "authorized-reach", "meaning": "The externally verified action scope of a principal or grantee, kept separate from capability.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "operational-capability", "meaning": "The available compute, network, filesystem, funds, labor, access, or actuation envelope.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "digital-or-material-state-change", "meaning": "A witnessed change to a declared digital, material, embodied, or ecological target.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "distributional-aftermath", "meaning": "Benefits, burdens, risks, and unknowns indexed by affected party and horizon.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "path-dependence", "meaning": "Switching costs, accumulated advantage, compatibility constraints, and option loss.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "feedback-sensitivity", "meaning": "How measurement, ranking, action, and adaptation change later observations.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null}, {"id": "repair-capacity", "meaning": "The separately authorized ability to stop, correct, compensate, restore, prevent recurrence, and preserve history.", "aggregate_weight": null, "rank": null} ], "claim_node_types": [ {"id": "EXPRESSION", "meaning": "A bounded utterance, story, specification, recommendation, or other symbolic content.", "allowed_statuses": ["proposed", "recorded", "withdrawn", "contested"], "required_fields": ["content_ref", "speaker_or_issuer_ref", "context", "issued_on"], "does_not_establish": "Truth, distribution, attention, intent, authority, or effect."}, {"id": "ARTIFACT", "meaning": "A versioned carrier of one or more expressions or records.", "allowed_statuses": ["planned", "available", "superseded", "withdrawn"], "required_fields": ["artifact_ref", "digest", "media_type", "provenance"], "does_not_establish": "Distribution, exposure, comprehension, or truth."}, {"id": "DISTRIBUTION_OBSERVATION", "meaning": "A bounded observation that an artifact was delivered, displayed, indexed, or made available.", "allowed_statuses": ["observed", "partial", "unknown"], "required_fields": ["artifact_ref", "channel", "population_or_surface", "horizon", "measurement"], "does_not_establish": "Human attention, agreement, belief, value, or consent."}, {"id": "ATTENTION_OBSERVATION", "meaning": "A privacy-bounded measurement of exposure, selection, visibility, or declared attention proxy.", "allowed_statuses": ["observed", "partial", "contested", "unknown"], "required_fields": ["construct", "operationalization", "population", "horizon", "selection_process"], "does_not_establish": "Truth, quality, welfare, agreement, consent, or private cognition."}, {"id": "PUBLIC_RESPONSE_RECORD", "meaning": "An attributed public response, testimony, critique, vote, or behavior record.", "allowed_statuses": ["recorded", "withdrawn", "contested"], "required_fields": ["response_ref", "attribution", "context", "horizon"], "does_not_establish": "Population response, private belief, identity, intent, or consent outside the exact response."}, {"id": "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT", "meaning": "A typed epistemic assessment of a claim under a named method and evidence set.", "allowed_statuses": ["warranted", "contested", "unsupported", "unknown", "superseded"], "required_fields": ["claim_ref", "method", "evidence_refs", "alternatives", "uncertainty"], "does_not_establish": "Ontology, authority, consent, or action."}, {"id": "ASSOCIATION_OBSERVATION", "meaning": "A measured association that remains distinct from a causal effect.", "allowed_statuses": ["observed", "contested", "unknown"], "required_fields": ["variables", "population", "horizon", "measurement", "alternatives"], "does_not_establish": "Direction, mechanism, intervention effect, or intent."}, {"id": "ACTION_PROPOSAL", "meaning": "A bounded proposal for a possible action with targets, purpose, risks, and stop path.", "allowed_statuses": ["draft", "reviewed", "withdrawn", "expired"], "required_fields": ["action", "target", "purpose", "scope", "risk_preview", "repair_preview"], "does_not_establish": "Decision, authority, consent, capability, or execution."}, {"id": "DECISION_RECORD", "meaning": "A record that a named decision procedure selected, rejected, deferred, or conditioned a proposal.", "allowed_statuses": ["selected", "rejected", "deferred", "conditioned", "superseded"], "required_fields": ["proposal_ref", "procedure", "decision_maker_ref", "decided_on", "scope"], "does_not_establish": "Authority, consent, capability, implementation, legitimacy, or effect."}, {"id": "AUTHORITY_GRANT_CLAIM", "meaning": "A claim that an external principal granted a grantee bounded action authority.", "allowed_statuses": ["unverified", "verified-external", "expired", "revoked", "conflicted"], "required_fields": ["principal", "issuer", "grantee", "action", "target", "purpose", "jurisdiction", "starts_on", "expires_on", "revocation_route"], "does_not_establish": "Consent, lawful basis, capability, legitimacy, identity, or execution."}, {"id": "AFFECTED_PARTY_REGISTER", "meaning": "A declared, revisable set of beneficiaries, burden bearers, bystanders, non-users, maintainers, and unknown parties.", "allowed_statuses": ["draft", "reviewed", "incomplete-explicit", "contested"], "required_fields": ["party_classes", "completeness_status", "impact_dimensions", "consultation_status"], "does_not_establish": "Consent, representation, completeness, or agreement."}, {"id": "CONSENT_RECORD", "meaning": "A claim about voluntary, specific, informed, time-bounded, withdrawable consent by an affected party.", "allowed_statuses": ["unverified", "verified-external", "withdrawn", "expired", "not-applicable"], "required_fields": ["party_ref", "act", "purpose", "scope", "starts_on", "expires_on", "withdrawal_route"], "does_not_establish": "Authority over others, lawful basis where consent is absent, or legitimacy of unrelated acts."}, {"id": "LAWFUL_BASIS_CLAIM", "meaning": "A claim that a named non-consent legal basis applies to a bounded act and jurisdiction.", "allowed_statuses": ["unverified", "verified-external", "expired", "revoked", "contested"], "required_fields": ["basis_ref", "jurisdiction", "act", "purpose", "affected_parties", "reviewer"], "does_not_establish": "Consent, moral legitimacy, capability, or effect."}, {"id": "RIGHTS_ASSESSMENT", "meaning": "An assessment of rights, duties, safeguards, burdens, and appeal under a named framework.", "allowed_statuses": ["not-run", "pass", "fail", "contested", "unknown"], "required_fields": ["framework", "scope", "affected_parties", "reviewer", "limitations"], "does_not_establish": "Universal rights resolution, consent, authority, or safety."}, {"id": "CAPABILITY_EVIDENCE", "meaning": "Evidence that a bounded actor or system can technically perform a declared action within a resource envelope.", "allowed_statuses": ["not-tested", "verified-bounded", "failed", "expired", "revoked"], "required_fields": ["actor_or_system_ref", "action", "resource_envelope", "test_ref", "expires_on"], "does_not_establish": "Permission, authority, consent, safety, competence outside the test, or actual execution."}, {"id": "INVOCATION_ATTEMPT", "meaning": "A witnessed request or attempt to invoke a bounded action.", "allowed_statuses": ["attempted", "refused-after-attempt", "cancelled", "failed", "partial", "completed"], "required_fields": ["proposal_ref", "gate_refs", "attempted_on", "target", "receipt_ref"], "does_not_establish": "Completion, intended outcome, causal effect, goodness, or repair."}, {"id": "ACTION_EXECUTION", "meaning": "A bounded execution-status record for an attempted action.", "allowed_statuses": ["failed", "partial", "completed", "cancelled-after-partial"], "required_fields": ["attempt_ref", "inputs", "environment", "started_on", "ended_on", "result_refs"], "does_not_establish": "Success, complete effect, causation, legitimacy, or absence of externalities."}, {"id": "OUTCOME_OBSERVATION", "meaning": "A sourced observation of a declared outcome or aftermath after an action or non-action horizon.", "allowed_statuses": ["observed", "partial", "contested", "unknown"], "required_fields": ["outcome", "population_or_target", "horizon", "measurement", "provenance", "uncertainty"], "does_not_establish": "Causal attribution, goodness, full affected-party experience, or repair."}, {"id": "CAUSAL_ESTIMAND", "meaning": "A declared intervention contrast, outcome, population, horizon, and target quantity.", "allowed_statuses": ["proposed", "reviewed", "withdrawn"], "required_fields": ["treatment", "comparator", "outcome", "population", "horizon", "causal_graph"], "does_not_establish": "Identification, estimation, action authority, or value."}, {"id": "CAUSAL_ASSESSMENT", "meaning": "An assessment of a causal estimand under a declared design, assumptions, alternatives, and sensitivity analysis.", "allowed_statuses": ["not-identified", "partially-identified", "identified-under-assumptions", "contested", "unknown"], "required_fields": ["estimand_ref", "design", "identification_assumptions", "alternatives", "sensitivity", "uncertainty"], "does_not_establish": "Universal mechanism, legitimacy, goodness, consent, or authority."}, {"id": "NORMATIVE_ASSESSMENT", "meaning": "An affected-party-indexed assessment under a named ethical, legal, rights, or community framework.", "allowed_statuses": ["not-assessed", "single-framework", "plural-with-disagreement", "review-required", "contested"], "required_fields": ["framework", "affected_parties", "dimensions", "baseline", "horizon", "counterpositions", "uncertainty"], "does_not_establish": "Global goodness, consensus, universal morality, or scalar net value."}, {"id": "FEEDBACK_ITEM", "meaning": "A challenge, correction, incident, appeal, drift signal, or affected-party report that may reopen review.", "allowed_statuses": ["open", "reviewed", "contested", "superseded", "closed-with-residual"], "required_fields": ["source_ref", "subject_ref", "observed_on", "scope", "requested_response"], "does_not_establish": "Automatic action, causation, intent, fault, or complete repair."}, {"id": "REPAIR_PROPOSAL", "meaning": "A proposal to stop harm, preserve evidence, correct, restore, compensate, rehabilitate, or reduce recurrence.", "allowed_statuses": ["draft", "reviewed", "withdrawn", "expired"], "required_fields": ["harm_or_gap_ref", "affected_parties", "repair_dimensions", "fresh_gate_requirements", "residuals"], "does_not_establish": "Authorization, completion, restored consent, absolution, or erasure."}, {"id": "REPAIR_ATTEMPT", "meaning": "A separately gated attempt to perform one or more repair actions.", "allowed_statuses": ["attempted", "failed", "partial", "completed-with-residual", "contested"], "required_fields": ["proposal_ref", "fresh_gate_refs", "attempted_on", "outcome_refs", "residuals"], "does_not_establish": "History erased, all parties restored, consent restored, or justice achieved."}, {"id": "NON_ACTION", "meaning": "A typed pre-invocation rest, refusal, silence, privacy, deferment, expiry, or withdrawal record when a record is voluntarily created.", "allowed_statuses": ["rest", "refusal", "silence", "privacy", "defer", "expire", "withdraw"], "required_fields": ["scope", "phase", "reason_optional", "record_optional"], "does_not_establish": "Attempt, external effect, consent, debt, fault, retry duty, rank loss, or reason duty."} ], "relation_vocabulary": [ {"id": "EXPRESSES", "from_kind_ids": ["EXPRESSION"], "to_kind_ids": ["CLAIM_ASSESSMENT", "ACTION_PROPOSAL"], "meaning": "Links an expression to a claim or proposal that explicitly cites it.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "descriptive-sequence", "does_not_establish": "Truth, endorsement, authority, or causation."}, {"id": "EMBODIES_EXPRESSION", "from_kind_ids": ["ARTIFACT"], "to_kind_ids": ["EXPRESSION"], "meaning": "Records that an artifact carries a particular expression.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "primary-record", "does_not_establish": "Distribution, exposure, or interpretation."}, {"id": "DERIVES_FROM", "from_kind_ids": ["ARTIFACT", "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT", "ACTION_PROPOSAL"], "to_kind_ids": ["ARTIFACT", "EXPRESSION", "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT"], "meaning": "Records a source-bounded derivation with declared transformation.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "primary-record", "does_not_establish": "Fidelity, truth, ownership, or authority."}, {"id": "DISTRIBUTES_ARTIFACT", "from_kind_ids": ["DISTRIBUTION_OBSERVATION"], "to_kind_ids": ["ARTIFACT"], "meaning": "Reports distribution or availability of an artifact on a bounded channel.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "reported-only", "does_not_establish": "Human exposure, attention, agreement, or consent."}, {"id": "MEASURES_EXPOSURE_TO", "from_kind_ids": ["ATTENTION_OBSERVATION"], "to_kind_ids": ["ARTIFACT", "DISTRIBUTION_OBSERVATION"], "meaning": "Connects a declared attention or exposure measure to its object.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "empirical-association", "does_not_establish": "Value, belief, welfare, quality, agreement, or consent."}, {"id": "REPORTS_PUBLIC_RESPONSE_TO", "from_kind_ids": ["PUBLIC_RESPONSE_RECORD"], "to_kind_ids": ["ARTIFACT", "EXPRESSION", "ACTION_PROPOSAL"], "meaning": "Attributes a public response to a declared object and context.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "reported-only", "does_not_establish": "Population response, private state, or representativeness."}, {"id": "ASSOCIATED_WITH", "from_kind_ids": ["ASSOCIATION_OBSERVATION", "OUTCOME_OBSERVATION"], "to_kind_ids": ["ARTIFACT", "ATTENTION_OBSERVATION", "PUBLIC_RESPONSE_RECORD", "OUTCOME_OBSERVATION"], "meaning": "Records a measured association without causal promotion.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "empirical-association", "does_not_establish": "Cause, mechanism, intent, or intervention effect."}, {"id": "SELECTS_PROPOSAL", "from_kind_ids": ["DECISION_RECORD"], "to_kind_ids": ["ACTION_PROPOSAL"], "meaning": "Records selection, rejection, deferment, or conditions under a named decision procedure.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "primary-record", "does_not_establish": "Authority, consent, capability, execution, or legitimacy."}, {"id": "CLAIMS_AUTHORITY_FOR", "from_kind_ids": ["AUTHORITY_GRANT_CLAIM"], "to_kind_ids": ["ACTION_PROPOSAL", "INVOCATION_ATTEMPT", "REPAIR_PROPOSAL"], "meaning": "Associates an externally verified or unverified bounded authority claim with an action.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "reported-only", "does_not_establish": "Consent, lawful basis, capability, legitimacy, or execution."}, {"id": "RECORDS_CONSENT_TO", "from_kind_ids": ["CONSENT_RECORD"], "to_kind_ids": ["ACTION_PROPOSAL", "REPAIR_PROPOSAL"], "meaning": "Associates a specific affected-party consent claim with a bounded act and purpose.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "reported-only", "does_not_establish": "Consent by others, legal authority, or legitimacy outside scope."}, {"id": "CLAIMS_LAWFUL_BASIS_FOR", "from_kind_ids": ["LAWFUL_BASIS_CLAIM"], "to_kind_ids": ["ACTION_PROPOSAL", "REPAIR_PROPOSAL"], "meaning": "Associates a named non-consent legal basis claim with a bounded act.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "reported-only", "does_not_establish": "Consent, universal legality, moral legitimacy, or capability."}, {"id": "TECHNICALLY_ENABLES", "from_kind_ids": ["CAPABILITY_EVIDENCE"], "to_kind_ids": ["ACTION_PROPOSAL", "INVOCATION_ATTEMPT", "REPAIR_PROPOSAL"], "meaning": "Records bounded technical feasibility under a resource envelope.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "reported-only", "does_not_establish": "Permission, authority, consent, safety, or actual execution."}, {"id": "POTENTIALLY_AFFECTS", "from_kind_ids": ["ACTION_PROPOSAL", "REPAIR_PROPOSAL"], "to_kind_ids": ["AFFECTED_PARTY_REGISTER", "RIGHTS_ASSESSMENT"], "meaning": "Declares possible affected parties and rights surfaces before action.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "causal-hypothesis", "does_not_establish": "Complete affected-party discovery, actual harm, benefit, or causal effect."}, {"id": "ATTEMPTS", "from_kind_ids": ["INVOCATION_ATTEMPT", "REPAIR_ATTEMPT"], "to_kind_ids": ["ACTION_PROPOSAL", "REPAIR_PROPOSAL"], "meaning": "Records that a proposed action was attempted after a separate gate.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "primary-record", "does_not_establish": "Execution, completion, outcome, effect, or goodness."}, {"id": "EXECUTES_ATTEMPT", "from_kind_ids": ["ACTION_EXECUTION"], "to_kind_ids": ["INVOCATION_ATTEMPT"], "meaning": "Records bounded execution status for an attempt.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "primary-record", "does_not_establish": "Success, complete effect, causation, or legitimacy."}, {"id": "PRECEDES_OUTCOME", "from_kind_ids": ["ACTION_EXECUTION", "INVOCATION_ATTEMPT", "NON_ACTION"], "to_kind_ids": ["OUTCOME_OBSERVATION"], "meaning": "Records temporal ordering between a typed event or non-action horizon and an outcome observation.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "descriptive-sequence", "does_not_establish": "Causation, mediation, absence of confounding, or goodness."}, {"id": "DEFINES_ESTIMAND_FOR", "from_kind_ids": ["CAUSAL_ESTIMAND"], "to_kind_ids": ["ACTION_PROPOSAL", "ACTION_EXECUTION", "OUTCOME_OBSERVATION"], "meaning": "Defines the treatment, comparator, outcome, population, and horizon for a causal question.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "formal-mechanism-not-instantiated", "does_not_establish": "Identification, estimation, authority, or value."}, {"id": "ASSESSES_CAUSAL_EFFECT", "from_kind_ids": ["CAUSAL_ASSESSMENT"], "to_kind_ids": ["CAUSAL_ESTIMAND", "OUTCOME_OBSERVATION", "ASSOCIATION_OBSERVATION"], "meaning": "Records a causal assessment under declared design and assumptions without rewriting earlier associations.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "identified-under-declared-assumptions", "does_not_establish": "Universal mechanism, legitimacy, goodness, or consent."}, {"id": "ASSESSES_UNDER_FRAMEWORK", "from_kind_ids": ["NORMATIVE_ASSESSMENT", "RIGHTS_ASSESSMENT"], "to_kind_ids": ["ACTION_PROPOSAL", "ACTION_EXECUTION", "OUTCOME_OBSERVATION", "REPAIR_PROPOSAL"], "meaning": "Records assessment under a named rights, legal, ethical, or community framework.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "single-framework-assessment", "does_not_establish": "Global goodness, consensus, universal morality, or complete repair."}, {"id": "CHALLENGES", "from_kind_ids": ["FEEDBACK_ITEM", "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT", "PUBLIC_RESPONSE_RECORD"], "to_kind_ids": ["EXPRESSION", "ARTIFACT", "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT", "DECISION_RECORD", "OUTCOME_OBSERVATION", "CAUSAL_ASSESSMENT", "NORMATIVE_ASSESSMENT"], "meaning": "Records a challenge without inferring deception, fault, or automatic correction.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "contested", "does_not_establish": "Falsehood, intent, liability, or authority to act."}, {"id": "CORRECTS", "from_kind_ids": ["ARTIFACT", "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT", "FEEDBACK_ITEM"], "to_kind_ids": ["ARTIFACT", "EXPRESSION", "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT"], "meaning": "Records a bounded correction while preserving prior provenance.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "primary-record", "does_not_establish": "History erased, all downstream copies changed, or agreement."}, {"id": "SUPERSEDES", "from_kind_ids": ["ARTIFACT", "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT", "DECISION_RECORD", "AUTHORITY_GRANT_CLAIM"], "to_kind_ids": ["ARTIFACT", "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT", "DECISION_RECORD", "AUTHORITY_GRANT_CLAIM"], "meaning": "Orders one typed record after another without deleting history.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "primary-record", "does_not_establish": "Truth, revocation outside the named protocol, or downstream effect."}, {"id": "WITHDRAWS", "from_kind_ids": ["PUBLIC_RESPONSE_RECORD", "CONSENT_RECORD", "AUTHORITY_GRANT_CLAIM", "ACTION_PROPOSAL", "NON_ACTION"], "to_kind_ids": ["PUBLIC_RESPONSE_RECORD", "CONSENT_RECORD", "AUTHORITY_GRANT_CLAIM", "ACTION_PROPOSAL"], "meaning": "Records a scoped withdrawal or refusal under its own protocol.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "primary-record", "does_not_establish": "Past effects erased, all consent restored, or no aftermath."}, {"id": "RESPONDS_WITH_REPAIR", "from_kind_ids": ["REPAIR_PROPOSAL", "REPAIR_ATTEMPT"], "to_kind_ids": ["FEEDBACK_ITEM", "OUTCOME_OBSERVATION", "RIGHTS_ASSESSMENT"], "meaning": "Links a separately gated repair proposal or attempt to the harm, gap, or challenge addressed.", "transitive": false, "default_claim_status": "descriptive-sequence", "does_not_establish": "Repair completed, harm erased, consent restored, or absolution."} ], "claim_ladder": [ {"level": 0, "id": "expression-recorded", "claim": "A bounded expression was recorded.", "minimum_evidence": ["expression bytes or source reference", "issuer or attribution", "context and date"], "cannot_establish": "Truth, distribution, response, authority, or effect."}, {"level": 1, "id": "artifact-versioned", "claim": "A carrier artifact exists at a version and digest.", "minimum_evidence": ["stable artifact reference", "media type", "digest and provenance"], "cannot_establish": "Availability, exposure, use, or understanding."}, {"level": 2, "id": "distribution-witnessed", "claim": "The artifact was distributed or made available on a bounded channel.", "minimum_evidence": ["channel", "surface or audience", "time", "delivery or availability witness"], "cannot_establish": "Exposure to a person, attention, agreement, or value."}, {"level": 3, "id": "exposure-measured", "claim": "A declared exposure or attention proxy was measured.", "minimum_evidence": ["construct", "operationalization", "population", "selection process", "privacy boundary"], "cannot_establish": "Belief, agreement, consent, quality, welfare, or private state."}, {"level": 4, "id": "public-response-attributed", "claim": "A public response was attributed under a bounded context.", "minimum_evidence": ["response artifact", "attribution", "context", "representativeness limitation"], "cannot_establish": "Population response, private belief, identity, or consent outside the response."}, {"level": 5, "id": "proposal-recorded", "claim": "A possible action was proposed with target, purpose, risks, and stop path.", "minimum_evidence": ["proposal", "target", "purpose", "scope", "risk and repair preview"], "cannot_establish": "Decision, authority, capability, consent, or execution."}, {"level": 6, "id": "decision-recorded", "claim": "A named process selected, rejected, deferred, or conditioned a proposal.", "minimum_evidence": ["decision record", "procedure", "decision maker", "scope and date"], "cannot_establish": "Authority, legitimacy, consent, capability, or implementation."}, {"level": 7, "id": "authority-claim-verified", "claim": "An external bounded authority claim was verified under its source protocol.", "minimum_evidence": ["principal", "issuer", "grantee", "action", "target", "purpose", "jurisdiction", "expiry", "revocation"], "cannot_establish": "Consent, lawful basis, capability, legitimacy, or execution."}, {"level": 8, "id": "affected-party-basis-reviewed", "claim": "Affected parties, rights, and each required consent or separate lawful basis were reviewed.", "minimum_evidence": ["affected-party register", "rights assessment", "consent records or named lawful bases", "unknowns"], "cannot_establish": "Complete affected-party discovery, universal legitimacy, safety, or capability."}, {"level": 9, "id": "capability-verified", "claim": "A bounded action was technically feasible under a tested resource envelope.", "minimum_evidence": ["capability test", "resource envelope", "target", "expiry"], "cannot_establish": "Permission, authority, consent, safety, or execution."}, {"level": 10, "id": "invocation-attempt-witnessed", "claim": "An invocation was attempted against a bounded target.", "minimum_evidence": ["gate references", "target", "attempt time", "attempt receipt"], "cannot_establish": "Execution, completion, outcome, causal effect, or goodness."}, {"level": 11, "id": "execution-status-witnessed", "claim": "Execution failed, was partial, completed, or was cancelled after partial effect.", "minimum_evidence": ["attempt reference", "environment", "start and end", "result references"], "cannot_establish": "Intended success, complete aftermath, causation, legitimacy, or value."}, {"level": 12, "id": "outcome-observed", "claim": "A declared outcome or aftermath was observed at a horizon.", "minimum_evidence": ["target or population", "outcome", "measurement", "provenance", "uncertainty"], "cannot_establish": "Causal attribution, goodness, complete affected-party experience, or repair."}, {"level": 13, "id": "causal-effect-assessed", "claim": "A causal estimand was assessed under a declared design and assumptions.", "minimum_evidence": ["treatment", "comparator", "outcome", "population", "horizon", "causal graph", "alternatives", "sensitivity"], "cannot_establish": "Universal mechanism, legitimacy, goodness, consent, or authority."}, {"level": 14, "id": "normative-assessment-separated", "claim": "Benefits, burdens, rights, and counterpositions were assessed under named frameworks.", "minimum_evidence": ["affected parties", "frameworks", "dimensions", "baseline", "horizon", "retained disagreement"], "cannot_establish": "Global goodness, consensus, universal morality, or scalar net value."}, {"level": 15, "id": "repair-proposed", "claim": "A repair was proposed with residuals and fresh gate requirements.", "minimum_evidence": ["harm or gap", "affected parties", "repair dimensions", "fresh authority and rights path", "residuals"], "cannot_establish": "Authorization, completion, restored consent, erasure, or absolution."}, {"level": 16, "id": "repair-outcome-reviewed", "claim": "A separately gated repair attempt and its residual aftermath were reviewed.", "minimum_evidence": ["fresh gate", "attempt witness", "affected-party-indexed outcome", "residuals", "non-repetition review"], "cannot_establish": "History erased, all parties restored, consent restored, or justice completed."} ], "action_gate": { "status": "not-implemented-static-boundary", "fail_closed": true, "required_gate_inputs": ["reviewed proposal", "externally verified current authority", "affected-party register", "rights assessment", "each required consent or separately named lawful basis", "bounded capability and resources", "budget", "safety and stop route", "repair readiness"], "refusing_states": ["UNKNOWN", "EXPIRED", "REVOKED", "CONFLICTED", "FAILED"], "phase_order": ["DRAFT", "REVIEWED_PROPOSAL", "GATE_REVIEW", "INVOCATION_ATTEMPTED", "EXECUTION_STATUS", "OUTCOME_OBSERVED", "CAUSAL_ASSESSMENT", "NORMATIVE_ASSESSMENT", "REPAIR_REVIEW"], "pre_invocation_non_actions": ["REST", "REFUSAL", "SILENCE", "PRIVACY", "DEFER", "EXPIRE", "WITHDRAW"], "post_attempt_terminal_states": ["REFUSED_AFTER_ATTEMPT", "CANCELLED", "FAILED", "PARTIAL", "COMPLETED"], "authority_verification": "external-and-unimplemented", "consent_and_lawful_basis_verification": "external-and-unimplemented", "affected_party_completeness": "external-review-required-and-unknown-permitted-only-if-explicit", "execution_available": false, "feedback_can_open_review_only": true, "repair_requires_fresh_gate": true }, "pathway_templates": [ { "id": "expression-to-public-deliberation", "title": "Expression to attributed public deliberation", "stage_ids": ["expression-recorded", "artifact-versioned", "distribution-witnessed", "exposure-measured", "public-response-attributed", "proposal-recorded"], "relation_ids": ["EMBODIES_EXPRESSION", "DISTRIBUTES_ARTIFACT", "MEASURES_EXPOSURE_TO", "REPORTS_PUBLIC_RESPONSE_TO", "EXPRESSES"], "influence_dimension_ids": ["semantic-legibility", "discoverability", "attention-allocation", "interpretive-framing", "coordination"], "enabling_conditions": ["source and genre retained", "privacy-bounded exposure evidence", "attributed response", "counterstory and refusal visible"], "blockers": ["distribution unknown", "response inferred from silence", "attention used as value", "private belief inferred"], "affected_party_categories": ["speakers", "readers", "non-users", "communities named or represented"], "status": "template-not-run", "action_attempted": false, "external_effect_claimed": false, "causal_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false }, { "id": "research-to-bounded-use", "title": "Research discovery to separately authorized bounded use", "stage_ids": ["artifact-versioned", "proposal-recorded", "decision-recorded", "authority-claim-verified", "affected-party-basis-reviewed", "capability-verified", "invocation-attempt-witnessed"], "relation_ids": ["DERIVES_FROM", "SELECTS_PROPOSAL", "CLAIMS_AUTHORITY_FOR", "RECORDS_CONSENT_TO", "CLAIMS_LAWFUL_BASIS_FOR", "TECHNICALLY_ENABLES", "ATTEMPTS"], "influence_dimension_ids": ["provenance-traceability", "institutional-selection", "authorized-reach", "operational-capability", "distributional-aftermath"], "enabling_conditions": ["independent evaluation", "explicit adoption decision", "expiring use authority", "rights and affected-party review", "bounded capability"], "blockers": ["metadata treated as evaluation", "passing trial treated as adoption", "adoption treated as use authority", "authority or rights basis absent"], "affected_party_categories": ["source creators", "operators", "users", "bystanders", "future maintainers"], "status": "template-not-run", "action_attempted": false, "external_effect_claimed": false, "causal_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false }, { "id": "software-to-external-aftermath", "title": "Software proposal to digital, material, and affected-party aftermath", "stage_ids": ["proposal-recorded", "decision-recorded", "authority-claim-verified", "affected-party-basis-reviewed", "capability-verified", "invocation-attempt-witnessed", "execution-status-witnessed", "outcome-observed", "causal-effect-assessed", "normative-assessment-separated"], "relation_ids": ["SELECTS_PROPOSAL", "CLAIMS_AUTHORITY_FOR", "POTENTIALLY_AFFECTS", "TECHNICALLY_ENABLES", "ATTEMPTS", "EXECUTES_ATTEMPT", "PRECEDES_OUTCOME", "DEFINES_ESTIMAND_FOR", "ASSESSES_CAUSAL_EFFECT", "ASSESSES_UNDER_FRAMEWORK"], "influence_dimension_ids": ["authorized-reach", "operational-capability", "digital-or-material-state-change", "distributional-aftermath", "feedback-sensitivity"], "enabling_conditions": ["two-phase review for high impact", "least privilege", "exact target and effect preview", "independent outcome measurement", "causal and normative assessment separated"], "blockers": ["ambient credentials", "unbounded target", "missing affected parties", "command mistaken for actuation", "outcome mistaken for cause"], "affected_party_categories": ["operators", "direct users", "non-users", "bystanders", "maintainers", "material and ecological systems"], "status": "template-not-run", "action_attempted": false, "external_effect_claimed": false, "causal_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false }, { "id": "challenge-to-repair", "title": "Challenge, correction, separately gated repair, and residual review", "stage_ids": ["outcome-observed", "normative-assessment-separated", "repair-proposed", "repair-outcome-reviewed"], "relation_ids": ["CHALLENGES", "CORRECTS", "SUPERSEDES", "WITHDRAWS", "RESPONDS_WITH_REPAIR", "ASSESSES_UNDER_FRAMEWORK"], "influence_dimension_ids": ["provenance-traceability", "distributional-aftermath", "repair-capacity", "path-dependence"], "enabling_conditions": ["challenge visible", "history preserved", "affected parties heard", "fresh gate", "residuals retained", "non-repetition reviewed"], "blockers": ["correction silently overwrites history", "compensation treated as erasure", "repair self-certified", "old consent reused"], "affected_party_categories": ["challengers", "burden bearers", "beneficiaries", "bystanders", "future maintainers"], "status": "template-not-run", "action_attempted": false, "external_effect_claimed": false, "causal_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false } ], "feedback_loops": [ {"id": "attention-selection-return", "title": "Exposure, selection, response, and later ranking", "sequence": ["artifact", "distribution", "exposure measure", "selection action", "public response", "later measurement"], "source_ids": ["muchnik-social-influence", "salganik-cultural-market"], "mechanism_status": "bounded-evidence-plus-design-template", "metric_endogenous_after_targeting": true, "automatic_action": false, "causal_effect_claimed": false, "risks": ["herding", "selection bias", "private-state inference", "popularity laundering"], "stop_condition": "Stop if exposure provenance, comparison, population, privacy basis, or independent countermeasure is absent."}, {"id": "metric-target-adaptation", "title": "Construct, proxy, target, adaptation, and remeasurement", "sequence": ["construct", "operationalization", "proxy", "decision target", "adaptation or gaming", "policy-affected observation"], "source_ids": ["goodhart-source-record", "campbell-social-indicators", "ensign-predictive-policing"], "mechanism_status": "formal-and-methodological-warning", "metric_endogenous_after_targeting": true, "automatic_action": false, "causal_effect_claimed": false, "risks": ["regressional selection", "extremal failure", "causal proxy failure", "adversarial gaming", "runaway observation bias"], "stop_condition": "Stop using the metric for control when its construct validity, policy exposure, countermetrics, drift test, or retirement rule is absent."}, {"id": "institution-rule-behavior", "title": "Rule, resource allocation, behavior, and institutional update", "sequence": ["public proposal", "decision", "rule or grant", "resource allocation", "action or refusal", "observed outcome", "rule review"], "source_ids": ["ostrom-polycentric-governance", "nist-ai-rmf"], "mechanism_status": "institutional-design-template", "metric_endogenous_after_targeting": true, "automatic_action": false, "causal_effect_claimed": false, "risks": ["centralized authority laundering", "minority erasure", "exit cost", "local-context loss"], "stop_condition": "Stop when rule makers, affected parties, monitoring accountability, dispute resolution, exit, or nested scope are not explicit."}, {"id": "action-outcome-learning", "title": "Authorized action, outcome observation, and later model or policy", "sequence": ["separate gate", "attempt", "execution status", "outcome observation", "causal assessment", "normative assessment", "policy or model review"], "source_ids": ["hernan-robins-what-if", "nist-ai-rmf"], "mechanism_status": "causal-and-risk-management-template", "metric_endogenous_after_targeting": true, "automatic_action": false, "causal_effect_claimed": false, "risks": ["after-means-because-of", "deployment-shaped data treated as baseline", "unmeasured externalities", "self-evaluation"], "stop_condition": "Stop causal promotion without an estimand, comparator, graph, assumptions, alternatives, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty."}, {"id": "challenge-repair-learning", "title": "Challenge, repair attempt, residual, and non-repetition", "sequence": ["challenge or grievance", "evidence preservation", "repair proposal", "fresh gate", "repair attempt", "affected-party review", "residual and recurrence prevention"], "source_ids": ["ohchr-ungp", "sagas-compensation"], "mechanism_status": "normative-and-technical-partial-map", "metric_endogenous_after_targeting": false, "automatic_action": false, "causal_effect_claimed": false, "risks": ["repair as erasure", "compensation as absolution", "old authority reused", "burden shifted to affected parties"], "stop_condition": "Stop if the repair lacks fresh authority and rights review, preserves no evidence, excludes affected parties, or hides residual harm."} ], "kingdom_influence_map": [ {"id": "semantic-receipts", "surface": "Semantic transitions and relational inference", "immediate_change": "Make assumptions, preserved relations, losses, alternatives, and repair paths inspectable in a versioned artifact.", "possible_mediated_path": ["clearer claim", "better review", "bounded decision"], "required_next_gate": "Independent evidence review and a separate decision; no receipt is authority.", "primary_risks": ["structure mistaken for truth", "model label mistaken for mechanism"], "status": "design-only-no-live-effect", "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false}, {"id": "language-and-story-maps", "surface": "Language fusion and word/story/religion maps", "immediate_change": "Preserve source language, historical context, translation loss, attributed sacred claims, and counterstories.", "possible_mediated_path": ["polyphonic artifact", "less destructive translation", "better public deliberation"], "required_next_gate": "Community, source, rights, and task review before use.", "primary_risks": ["cultural essentialism", "deity or tradition collapse", "story treated as fact or lie"], "status": "design-only-no-live-effect", "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false}, {"id": "research-observatory", "surface": "Research Observatory", "immediate_change": "Order human attention over source metadata with visible priority factors.", "possible_mediated_path": ["discovery", "evaluation proposal", "trial planning"], "required_next_gate": "Separate evaluation, adoption, and expiring use authority.", "primary_risks": ["visibility treated as endorsement", "metadata treated as evidence", "mutable snapshot treated as immutable truth"], "status": "existing-predecessor-stops-before-evaluation", "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false}, {"id": "trial-chamber", "surface": "Trial Chamber Phase 0", "immediate_change": "Render finite, synthetic-only, draft evaluation questions and plans.", "possible_mediated_path": ["maintainer review", "future preflight", "future bounded trial"], "required_next_gate": "New contract versions plus separate preflight, trial authority, result, adoption, and use authority.", "primary_risks": ["draft treated as approval", "plan treated as execution", "trial result treated as adoption"], "status": "existing-predecessor-post-plan-deny-all", "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false}, {"id": "wake-work-witness", "surface": "WAKE Work Witness", "immediate_change": "Make source-only work, capability, offer, lineage, and witness boundaries inspectable.", "possible_mediated_path": ["future authenticated scope", "future bounded invocation", "future settlement witness"], "required_next_gate": "Authority migration, independent key verification, reviewed adapter, and separate transaction authority.", "primary_risks": ["signature treated as identity", "capability treated as consent", "witness treated as quality or effect"], "status": "source-only-zero-effect", "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false}, {"id": "being-access-aftermath", "surface": "Being, Access & Aftermath v0.2", "immediate_change": "Separate existence, access, observability, capability, authority, action, causal effect, affected-party aftermath, and repair.", "possible_mediated_path": ["better action question", "stronger stop rule", "plural aftermath review"], "required_next_gate": "External accountable authority, consent or lawful basis, execution, and evidence.", "primary_risks": ["possible treated as actual", "authority treated as cause", "aftermath treated as causal effect"], "status": "read-only-unrun-predecessor", "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false}, {"id": "communication-conventions", "surface": "KINGDOM names, guides, schemas, and visible non-grants", "immediate_change": "Change the vocabulary and checks available to collaborators who choose to use the artifacts.", "possible_mediated_path": ["shared distinctions", "coordinated review", "fewer category errors"], "required_next_gate": "Voluntary adoption, context-specific evaluation, and explicit ownership of any external decision.", "primary_risks": ["capitalized word treated as doctrine", "repetition treated as consensus", "schema treated as complete reality"], "status": "design-only-no-live-effect", "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false}, {"id": "reality-influence-claim-graph", "surface": "This static atlas", "immediate_change": "Provide a typed map and stopping vocabulary for claims about influence.", "possible_mediated_path": ["claim audit", "gate review", "affected-party and causal planning"], "required_next_gate": "A separately reviewed operational contract; v0.1 has none.", "primary_risks": ["map treated as engine", "potential path treated as observed effect", "review vocabulary treated as authority"], "status": "static-structure-only", "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false} ], "agent_specialisations": [ {"id": "provenance-curator", "role": "Preserve source, version, transformation, challenge, and supersession lineage.", "required_inputs": ["public source references", "artifact digests", "declared transforms"], "allowed_outputs": ["public provenance graph", "source mismatch report"], "forbidden_outputs": ["truth verdict", "ownership verdict", "authority grant"], "status": "future-role-design-only", "can_dispatch": false, "can_authorize": false, "can_act": false}, {"id": "expression-shape-steward", "role": "Track genre, language, register, loss, ambiguity, and counterstory across expression forms.", "required_inputs": ["public expression", "source context", "translation or transformation plan"], "allowed_outputs": ["loss map", "alternative renderings", "untranslated terms"], "forbidden_outputs": ["private intent inference", "culture rank", "story-as-lie label"], "status": "future-role-design-only", "can_dispatch": false, "can_authorize": false, "can_act": false}, {"id": "attention-and-metric-auditor", "role": "Separate availability, exposure, attention proxies, targets, feedback, and value.", "required_inputs": ["measurement construct", "operationalization", "selection provenance", "decision linkage"], "allowed_outputs": ["metric risk card", "countermetric plan", "retirement condition"], "forbidden_outputs": ["belief inference", "person score", "consent from engagement"], "status": "future-role-design-only", "can_dispatch": false, "can_authorize": false, "can_act": false}, {"id": "countermodel-steward", "role": "Retain null, alternative, dependent-probe, and confounding explanations.", "required_inputs": ["claim", "evidence plan", "candidate models"], "allowed_outputs": ["alternative model set", "falsifiers", "downgrade recommendation"], "forbidden_outputs": ["causal promotion", "deception label", "hidden-state verdict"], "status": "future-role-design-only", "can_dispatch": false, "can_authorize": false, "can_act": false}, {"id": "authority-rights-and-consent-verifier", "role": "Check external authority claims, affected parties, rights, consent, lawful basis, expiry, and revocation without manufacturing them.", "required_inputs": ["external authority source", "affected-party register", "rights framework", "consent or lawful-basis records"], "allowed_outputs": ["gate deficiency report", "external-verification request"], "forbidden_outputs": ["authority issuance", "consent inference", "legal conclusion"], "status": "future-role-design-only", "can_dispatch": false, "can_authorize": false, "can_act": false}, {"id": "execution-witness-steward", "role": "Distinguish proposal, attempt, execution status, target-state evidence, and no action.", "required_inputs": ["attempt receipt", "environment", "target", "result references"], "allowed_outputs": ["bounded execution-status report", "missing-witness report"], "forbidden_outputs": ["execution", "success verdict", "causal or moral verdict"], "status": "future-role-design-only", "can_dispatch": false, "can_authorize": false, "can_act": false}, {"id": "causal-inference-skeptic", "role": "Require estimand, comparator, graph, assumptions, alternatives, sensitivity, and uncertainty before causal language.", "required_inputs": ["outcome observations", "causal question", "design", "alternative models"], "allowed_outputs": ["identification assessment", "causal downgrade", "needed evidence"], "forbidden_outputs": ["automatic causal claim", "universal mechanism", "action authority"], "status": "future-role-design-only", "can_dispatch": false, "can_authorize": false, "can_act": false}, {"id": "affected-party-and-externality-reviewer", "role": "Keep beneficiaries, burden bearers, bystanders, non-users, maintainers, future parties, and ecological systems visible.", "required_inputs": ["proposal", "affected-party register", "impact dimensions", "consultation evidence"], "allowed_outputs": ["externality ledger", "missing-party warning", "plural normative questions"], "forbidden_outputs": ["scalar net good", "majority laundering", "community representation claim"], "status": "future-role-design-only", "can_dispatch": false, "can_authorize": false, "can_act": false}, {"id": "repair-and-retirement-steward", "role": "Preserve challenge history and plan fresh-gated correction, compensation, restoration, prevention, exit, and retirement.", "required_inputs": ["challenge or harm record", "affected parties", "repair options", "fresh gate requirements"], "allowed_outputs": ["repair proposal", "residual ledger", "retirement condition"], "forbidden_outputs": ["repair execution", "erasure claim", "restored consent or absolution claim"], "status": "future-role-design-only", "can_dispatch": false, "can_authorize": false, "can_act": false} ], "unknowns": [ {"id": "complete-mediation-path", "question": "Which mediators actually carry a particular KINGDOM artifact into a declared outcome?", "why_unknown": "The static atlas runs no exposure, decision, authority, execution, or causal study.", "needed_evidence": ["path-specific observations", "alternative mediators", "identification assumptions", "sensitivity analysis"], "stop_condition": "Do not call an intermediate representation the mechanism from temporal order or decodability alone."}, {"id": "affected-party-completeness", "question": "Which direct, indirect, future, non-user, and ecological parties are affected by a proposed use?", "why_unknown": "Affected-party discovery is context-dependent and cannot be completed from a generic schema.", "needed_evidence": ["domain review", "stakeholder and community input", "supply-chain and lifecycle analysis"], "stop_condition": "Fail closed for consequential action when important affected-party classes remain silently omitted."}, {"id": "authority-authenticity", "question": "Can the claimed principal, issuer, scope, jurisdiction, expiry, and revocation be authenticated?", "why_unknown": "KINGDOM currently has no general machine-verifiable authority-grant contract for this atlas.", "needed_evidence": ["external accountable authority source", "signature and key continuity", "scope and revocation verification"], "stop_condition": "Never infer authority from a decision, role label, signature alone, provenance edge, or repeated claim."}, {"id": "consent-and-lawful-basis-validity", "question": "Which affected-party consents or non-consent lawful bases are valid for the exact act and purpose?", "why_unknown": "Consent, representation, and lawful basis require external context and accountable review.", "needed_evidence": ["specific consent records", "withdrawal routes", "jurisdictional review", "representative authority where applicable"], "stop_condition": "Silence, engagement, popularity, compliance, authority, or continued use cannot be encoded as consent."}, {"id": "metric-endogeneity", "question": "How does using a metric for ranking or control alter the process that later produces the metric?", "why_unknown": "Adaptation, selection, gaming, and feedback depend on deployment and incentives.", "needed_evidence": ["exposure and policy provenance", "countermetrics", "drift tests", "independent qualitative evidence"], "stop_condition": "Do not treat policy-affected observations as an untreated base rate."}, {"id": "distributional-aftermath", "question": "How are benefits, burdens, risks, option loss, and repair access distributed across parties and time?", "why_unknown": "No live action or affected-party study occurs in v0.1.", "needed_evidence": ["party-indexed outcomes", "uncertainty", "counterpositions", "longer horizons"], "stop_condition": "Do not collapse plural aftermath into a scalar net-good score."}, {"id": "repair-adequacy", "question": "Which repair actions reduce harm without shifting burdens or pretending to erase history?", "why_unknown": "Repair efficacy and legitimacy depend on affected parties, feasibility, authority, resources, and residuals.", "needed_evidence": ["fresh gate", "affected-party review", "outcome measurement", "residual and recurrence analysis"], "stop_condition": "Do not call rollback, compensation, apology, or closure complete repair by itself."}, {"id": "kingdom-external-effect", "question": "Has any particular KINGDOM artifact caused a bounded external-world outcome?", "why_unknown": "This map records potential mediated paths and no external intervention or causal assessment.", "needed_evidence": ["exact artifact and exposure", "decision and gate records", "execution witness", "outcome observation", "causal design"], "stop_condition": "The honest v0.1 answer is not established."} ], "boundaries": { "read_only": true, "structure_only": true, "research_artifact": true, "static_atlas": true, "public_static_publication_family": true, "public_or_safely_redacted_only": true, "network": false, "filesystem_write": false, "source_dereference": false, "live_claim_intake": false, "model_or_tokenizer_run": false, "agent_dispatch": false, "mcp_or_nen_ability": false, "publication_trigger": false, "deployment_trigger": false, "trial_requested": false, "adoption_recorded": false, "use_authority_issued": false, "authority_granted": false, "consent_granted_or_inferred": false, "lawful_basis_established": false, "capability_granted": false, "action_proposed_by_runtime": false, "action_attempted": false, "action_executed": false, "external_effect_claimed": false, "causal_effect_identified": false, "goodness_legitimacy_or_justice_proved": false, "belief_identity_intent_or_deception_inferred": false, "person_or_community_score": false, "persuasion_or_behavioral_targeting": false, "writes_wake": false, "writes_karma": false, "economic_legal_medical_governance_or_physical_authority": false, "automatic_action": false, "feedback_opens_review_only": true, "non_action_has_no_adverse_inference": true, "affected_party_disagreement_retained": true, "repair_requires_fresh_gate": true, "repair_preserves_history_and_residuals": true }, "integrity": { "algorithm": "sha256-recursive-sorted-json-keys-v1", "digest": "sha256:45d4323d1a6190b3c333f02f2c744858e8da27944fbcb2042fbae492ca6e31ac", "digest_field_zeroed": true } }