{ "$schema": "urn:kingdom:schema:civilisation-reality-projection:0.1", "protocol": "kingdom.civilisation-reality-projection/0.1", "projection_id": "civilisation-reality-projection-2026-08-25", "version": "0.1.0", "title": "Civilisation → Reality Projection", "compiled_on": "2026-08-25", "evidence_through": "2026-08-21", "state": "reviewed-thin-additive-crosswalk", "scope": { "question": "Where do the existing Word, Story, Religion & Civilisation map and the Reality Influence Claim Graph meet without pretending that either predecessor already explains war, power, class, emotion, revolution, propaganda, or governance?", "intended_use": [ "Trace six exact conceptual seams between two immutable public KINGDOM predecessors.", "Make translation loss and unsupported domains visible before any broader civilisation atlas is proposed.", "Provide a small inspectable discovery surface for humans and machines." ], "excluded_use": [ "A theory, score, ranking, prediction, simulator, or causal model of civilisation.", "A theological adjudication, belief inference, persuasion system, propaganda design, or person or group targeting tool.", "A source of authority, consent, lawful basis, operational instruction, action, publication trigger, or deployment trigger." ], "unit_of_analysis": "One explicitly lossy crosswalk between named source concepts in the civilisation map and named target concepts in the reality claim graph.", "projection_rule": "A crosswalk records a possible reading between already-published concepts; it neither merges their types nor extends, proves, or transfers either predecessor's claims.", "open_domain_rule": "If the two bound predecessors do not carry enough typed evidence for a requested domain, the domain remains open and no placeholder mechanism is invented.", "data_classification": "public-static-research-crosswalk" }, "projection_rules": { "source_claims_remain_in_predecessor": true, "qualified_predecessor_ids_required": true, "no_transitive_influence": true, "no_cross_register_promotion": true, "association_is_not_causation": true, "historical_claim_is_not_design_mandate": true, "design_commitment_is_not_historical_finding": true, "metaphysical_non_adjudication": true, "influence_is_non_summable": true, "no_person_community_religion_or_civilisation_score": true }, "predecessor_bindings": [ { "id": "word-story-religion-civilisation", "protocol": "kingdom.word-story-religion-civilisation-map/0.1", "map_id": "word-story-religion-civilisation-2026-08-20", "locator": "repo:data/language/word-story-religion-civilisation-map.v0.1.json", "raw_digest": "sha256:a4a87b7b23dbdf7e7e6689b5083f76a746c7f41bc56f2124281dfda609a62479", "semantic_digest": "sha256:0c791b2491ebdcd85cf58e26e41e8b35b883781fd26bccc19dfd3f7853c7855a", "relation": "source-concept-predecessor", "mutated": false, "republished": false, "authority_imported": false }, { "id": "reality-influence-claim-graph", "protocol": "kingdom.reality-influence-claim-graph/0.1", "map_id": "reality-influence-claim-graph-2026-08-21", "locator": "repo:data/reality/reality-influence-map.v0.1.json", "raw_digest": "sha256:4d68be39226c8d5451c8d9166fa74ba54bb793b7655f119d8765090cbbcf890e", "semantic_digest": "sha256:45d4323d1a6190b3c333f02f2c744858e8da27944fbcb2042fbae492ca6e31ac", "relation": "target-claim-boundary-predecessor", "mutated": false, "republished": false, "authority_imported": false } ], "crosswalks": [ { "id": "naming-to-expression", "source_binding_ids": [ "word-story-religion-civilisation" ], "source_relation_ids": [ "articulation-and-naming" ], "source_insight_ids": [ "coordinate-words-remain-expanded" ], "target_domain_ids": [ "semantic-symbolic", "informational-record" ], "target_node_type_ids": [ "EXPRESSION", "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT" ], "target_relation_ids": [ "EXPRESSES" ], "target_ladder_ids": [ "expression-recorded" ], "target_pathway_ids": [ "expression-to-public-deliberation" ], "register": "DESIGN_COMMITMENT", "transfer_status": "projection-not-historical-or-causal-finding", "statement": "A word, name, or invocation may be represented as an attributed expression record before any artifact, circulation, uptake, belief, authority, or effect claim.", "preserved_distinctions": [ "Word or name remains distinct from sacred referent, truth, belief, understanding, uptake, and world state.", "An EXPRESSION node does not import every language-specific or tradition-specific semantic coordinate." ], "required_evidence": [ "An attributable expression and its bounded context.", "Separate records for any later artifact, distribution, response, decision, or outcome claim." ], "alternative_paths": [ "The expression may remain private, untranslated, contested, refused, forgotten, or never materialized.", "Different communities may retain non-equivalent referent and interpretation charts." ], "stop_conditions": [ "Stop before claiming referent identity, theological truth, belief, understanding, agreement, or causal influence.", "Stop when attribution or the relevant language and community context cannot be supported." ], "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false }, { "id": "story-to-public-deliberation", "source_binding_ids": [ "word-story-religion-civilisation" ], "source_relation_ids": [ "story-performance-memory" ], "source_insight_ids": [ "story-orients-without-proving" ], "target_domain_ids": [ "semantic-symbolic", "informational-record", "attention-exposure", "normative-public" ], "target_node_type_ids": [ "EXPRESSION", "ARTIFACT", "DISTRIBUTION_OBSERVATION", "ATTENTION_OBSERVATION", "PUBLIC_RESPONSE_RECORD" ], "target_relation_ids": [ "EMBODIES_EXPRESSION", "DISTRIBUTES_ARTIFACT", "MEASURES_EXPOSURE_TO", "REPORTS_PUBLIC_RESPONSE_TO" ], "target_ladder_ids": [ "expression-recorded", "artifact-versioned", "distribution-witnessed", "exposure-measured", "public-response-attributed" ], "target_pathway_ids": [ "expression-to-public-deliberation" ], "register": "DESIGN_COMMITMENT", "transfer_status": "projection-not-historical-or-causal-finding", "statement": "A story or teaching may be traced as expression, versioned artifact, witnessed distribution and exposure, and attributed public response only when each stage has separate evidence.", "preserved_distinctions": [ "Narrative memory, ritual performance, exposure, response, private belief, agreement, and collective decision remain different events.", "Orientation or public response does not prove truth, consensus, consent, legitimacy, or causal influence." ], "required_evidence": [ "Versioned artifact provenance and separately scoped distribution, exposure, and response witnesses.", "Alternative explanations and explicit limits for any association claim." ], "alternative_paths": [ "A story may circulate without measurable exposure or public response.", "Similar public responses may arise from institutions, material conditions, prior commitments, other stories, or unobserved causes." ], "stop_conditions": [ "Stop at the last independently evidenced stage in the public-deliberation pathway.", "Stop before inferring private belief, consensus, consent, legitimacy, persuasion, or causal effect." ], "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false }, { "id": "canon-to-selection-feedback", "source_binding_ids": [ "word-story-religion-civilisation" ], "source_relation_ids": [ "canon-curriculum-selection" ], "source_insight_ids": [ "canon-is-governance-transform", "attention-and-persistence-are-not-truth" ], "target_domain_ids": [ "attention-exposure", "social-relational", "institutional-status", "normative-public" ], "target_node_type_ids": [ "ARTIFACT", "DISTRIBUTION_OBSERVATION", "ATTENTION_OBSERVATION", "ACTION_PROPOSAL", "DECISION_RECORD", "FEEDBACK_ITEM" ], "target_relation_ids": [ "DERIVES_FROM", "SELECTS_PROPOSAL", "CHALLENGES", "CORRECTS", "SUPERSEDES", "WITHDRAWS" ], "target_ladder_ids": [ "artifact-versioned", "distribution-witnessed", "exposure-measured", "proposal-recorded", "decision-recorded" ], "target_pathway_ids": [ "expression-to-public-deliberation", "research-to-bounded-use" ], "register": "DESIGN_COMMITMENT", "transfer_status": "projection-not-historical-or-causal-finding", "statement": "Canon and curriculum selection may be inspected as artifact selection, distribution, attention, proposal, decision, challenge, correction, supersession, and withdrawal records rather than as a single truth or influence score.", "preserved_distinctions": [ "Selection of texts, selection of a proposal, institutional authorization, and actual adoption are not the same operation.", "Neither predecessor supplies a complete account of who controls selection, who is excluded, or how material incentives alter the loop." ], "required_evidence": [ "Versioned selection criteria, decision provenance, distribution and attention observations, and records of challenge or omission.", "Evidence about selectors, affected communities, alternatives, incentives, exclusions, and changes after feedback." ], "alternative_paths": [ "Persistence may follow copying cost, patronage, infrastructure, censorship, curriculum design, community care, accident, or path dependence.", "Attention can increase, fragment, shift to counterstories, or decouple from institutional selection." ], "stop_conditions": [ "Stop before turning selection, persistence, visibility, or attention into truth, merit, consensus, consent, or legitimacy.", "Stop when selectors, alternatives, exclusions, or affected parties are materially unknown." ], "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false }, { "id": "legitimation-to-decision-authority-separation", "source_binding_ids": [ "word-story-religion-civilisation" ], "source_relation_ids": [ "sacred-order-legitimation-and-critique" ], "source_insight_ids": [ "counterauthority-before-synthesis", "story-orients-without-proving" ], "target_domain_ids": [ "institutional-status", "legal-jurisdictional", "normative-public" ], "target_node_type_ids": [ "ACTION_PROPOSAL", "DECISION_RECORD", "AUTHORITY_GRANT_CLAIM", "AFFECTED_PARTY_REGISTER", "CONSENT_RECORD", "LAWFUL_BASIS_CLAIM", "RIGHTS_ASSESSMENT", "CAPABILITY_EVIDENCE" ], "target_relation_ids": [ "SELECTS_PROPOSAL", "CLAIMS_AUTHORITY_FOR", "RECORDS_CONSENT_TO", "CLAIMS_LAWFUL_BASIS_FOR", "POTENTIALLY_AFFECTS", "TECHNICALLY_ENABLES" ], "target_ladder_ids": [ "proposal-recorded", "decision-recorded", "authority-claim-verified", "affected-party-basis-reviewed", "capability-verified" ], "target_pathway_ids": [ "research-to-bounded-use" ], "register": "DESIGN_COMMITMENT", "transfer_status": "projection-not-historical-or-causal-finding", "statement": "A sacred-order legitimation or critique may be traced as an attributed claim, while proposal, decision, authority, consent or lawful basis, rights review, capability, execution, legitimacy, and justice remain separate questions.", "preserved_distinctions": [ "The reality graph does not adjudicate sacred authority or import it as legal, technical, democratic, or moral authority.", "Recording a decision or authority claim does not make the decision authorized, legitimate, just, consensual, or executable." ], "required_evidence": [ "Attributed legitimation and counterauthority claims in their own registers.", "Separate current records for decision procedure, authority, jurisdiction, affected parties, consent or lawful basis, rights, capability, and review." ], "alternative_paths": [ "The same sacred narrative may authorize, constrain, criticize, or remain irrelevant to different institutions and communities.", "A decision can be reversed, refused, blocked, unauthorized, unlawful, incapable of execution, or normatively contested." ], "stop_conditions": [ "Stop before treating sacred, historical, legal, democratic, technical, or moral authority as interchangeable.", "Stop before any action unless a separate current gate independently verifies every required authority, rights, affected-party, capability, and consent or lawful-basis input." ], "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false }, { "id": "translation-to-claim-assessment", "source_binding_ids": [ "word-story-religion-civilisation" ], "source_relation_ids": [ "translation-contact-remaking" ], "source_insight_ids": [ "translation-preserves-seams", "polyphonic-fusion-not-unification" ], "target_domain_ids": [ "semantic-symbolic", "informational-record", "normative-public" ], "target_node_type_ids": [ "EXPRESSION", "ARTIFACT", "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT", "NORMATIVE_ASSESSMENT", "ACTION_PROPOSAL" ], "target_relation_ids": [ "DERIVES_FROM", "ASSESSES_UNDER_FRAMEWORK", "CHALLENGES", "CORRECTS" ], "target_ladder_ids": [ "expression-recorded", "artifact-versioned", "normative-assessment-separated", "proposal-recorded" ], "target_pathway_ids": [], "register": "DESIGN_COMMITMENT", "transfer_status": "projection-not-historical-or-causal-finding", "statement": "A translated or remade expression may retain provenance to a source artifact and carry a bounded assessment under a declared framework while non-equivalence, dissent, and correction remain visible.", "preserved_distinctions": [ "Provenance does not establish semantic fidelity, understanding, identity of referents, truth, or permission to speak for a tradition or community.", "A framework-specific assessment is not a universal judgment and cannot silently replace the source voice." ], "required_evidence": [ "Versioned source and translation artifacts, translator position and method, declared framework, known losses, and community or specialist counterreadings where relevant.", "Separate evidence for any claimed reception, institutional selection, decision, or outcome." ], "alternative_paths": [ "A term may require multiple parallel translations, retained original wording, refusal to translate, or a declared unresolved seam.", "Communities may contest the source edition, translation, referent, genre, authority, or assessment framework." ], "stop_conditions": [ "Stop when a translation would collapse distinct deities, traditions, concepts, genres, communities, or claim registers.", "Stop before inferring understanding, shared belief, doctrinal identity, consent, or authority from lexical overlap." ], "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false }, { "id": "counterstory-to-challenge-repair", "source_binding_ids": [ "word-story-religion-civilisation" ], "source_relation_ids": [ "suppression-counterstory-revival" ], "source_insight_ids": [ "counterauthority-before-synthesis", "community-access-precedes-convenience" ], "target_domain_ids": [ "semantic-symbolic", "informational-record", "attention-exposure", "social-relational", "institutional-status", "normative-public" ], "target_node_type_ids": [ "EXPRESSION", "ARTIFACT", "CLAIM_ASSESSMENT", "OUTCOME_OBSERVATION", "NORMATIVE_ASSESSMENT", "FEEDBACK_ITEM", "REPAIR_PROPOSAL", "REPAIR_ATTEMPT", "ACTION_PROPOSAL", "NON_ACTION" ], "target_relation_ids": [ "CHALLENGES", "CORRECTS", "SUPERSEDES", "WITHDRAWS", "RESPONDS_WITH_REPAIR", "ASSESSES_UNDER_FRAMEWORK" ], "target_ladder_ids": [ "expression-recorded", "artifact-versioned", "outcome-observed", "normative-assessment-separated", "repair-proposed", "repair-outcome-reviewed", "proposal-recorded" ], "target_pathway_ids": [ "challenge-to-repair" ], "register": "DESIGN_COMMITMENT", "transfer_status": "projection-not-historical-or-causal-finding", "statement": "A documented counterstory may challenge an artifact, claim, or assessment and may be followed by distinct correction, supersession, withdrawal, repair proposal, repair attempt, outcome observation, and renewed review records.", "preserved_distinctions": [ "Challenge is not disproof, revival is not restoration, and repair is not erasure, absolution, recovered consent, or proof that harm ended.", "Suppression, archive survival, counterstory reception, institutional change, and material aftermath require separate evidence." ], "required_evidence": [ "Attributed suppressed and counterstory artifacts, preservation and access history, institutional response, affected-party record, and separately witnessed repair attempt and aftermath.", "Counterevidence, residual harm, dissent about repair, and a fresh gate for any further intervention." ], "alternative_paths": [ "A challenge may remain unanswered, be refused, coexist with the challenged record, produce correction without material repair, or reveal disagreement that cannot be synthesized.", "Revival may serve memory, critique, identity, art, ritual, politics, or new institutional purposes without restoring an earlier world." ], "stop_conditions": [ "Stop before erasing the challenged record, opposition, residual harm, affected-party disagreement, or the limits of the repair evidence.", "Stop when repair would require unverified authority, consent or lawful basis, capability, affected-party coverage, or a new action gate." ], "external_effect_claimed": false, "authority_granted": false } ], "open_domains": [ { "id": "war-and-organised-violence", "question": "How do organised violence, military competition, defeat, occupation, and peace settlements reshape institutions, stories, resources, and citizenship?", "coverage_status": "not-supported-by-pinned-predecessors", "why_not_projectable": "The civilisation predecessor names contestation and coercion only inside selected word, story, religion, and civilisation windows; the reality predecessor is a claim-boundary graph, not a theory or history of war.", "needed_evidence": [ "Conflict-specific primary records and comparative historical research.", "Separate evidence for coercion, institutions, resources, affected parties, and aftermath." ], "stop_condition": "Do not infer a war mechanism, prediction, strategy, legitimacy, or authorization from story/religion relations or generic reality-domain labels." }, { "id": "coercion-and-security-capacity", "question": "How do policing, military, surveillance, incarceration, and other coercive capacities interact with administrative capacity and rights?", "coverage_status": "not-supported-by-pinned-predecessors", "why_not_projectable": "Neither predecessor models coercive organizations, command structures, force, compliance, state capacity, or lawful and unlawful uses of force.", "needed_evidence": [ "Institution-specific legal, administrative, fiscal, and operational records.", "Affected-party testimony and independent rights and aftermath assessment." ], "stop_condition": "Do not translate a legitimacy claim, institution label, or capability record into permission to coerce or evidence that coercion was lawful, necessary, proportionate, or effective." }, { "id": "class-and-resource-asymmetry", "question": "How do unequal ownership, labour relations, taxation, debt, patronage, and access to essentials shape participation and institutional power?", "coverage_status": "not-supported-by-pinned-predecessors", "why_not_projectable": "The predecessors can name economic patronage and economic-resource domains but do not provide class analysis, incidence, ownership, labour, or distributional evidence.", "needed_evidence": [ "Distributional, ownership, labour, fiscal, and material-flow evidence.", "Competing class concepts and explicit units of comparison." ], "stop_condition": "Do not infer class position, interests, exploitation, benefit, burden, or resource incidence from cultural, religious, attention, or institutional labels alone." }, { "id": "status-hierarchy-and-elite-fracture", "question": "How do status orders, inherited rank, elite competition, coalition fracture, and mobility shape legitimacy and institutional change?", "coverage_status": "not-supported-by-pinned-predecessors", "why_not_projectable": "Specialist roles and institutions appear in the civilisation map, but neither predecessor supplies a general status model, elite-network evidence, or fracture mechanism.", "needed_evidence": [ "Context-specific status categories and institutional records.", "Evidence distinguishing hierarchy, prestige, class, office, faction, and coercive position." ], "stop_condition": "Do not rank people or groups, impute elite membership or motive, or infer coalition fracture from specialist roles, public claims, or status language." }, { "id": "collective-emotion-and-affect", "question": "How do fear, anger, humiliation, grief, hope, love, care, hate, and belonging interact with attention, participation, restraint, and violence?", "coverage_status": "not-supported-by-pinned-predecessors", "why_not_projectable": "Public response records do not reveal private or collective mental states, and the civilisation map does not establish an emotion mechanism.", "needed_evidence": [ "Ethically collected, context-specific affect evidence with privacy and inference limits.", "Separate treatment of expression, self-report, behaviour, physiology, institution, and cultural vocabulary." ], "stop_condition": "Do not infer an individual or collective emotion, diagnosis, intent, consent, hostility, or susceptibility from expressions, stories, exposure, response, silence, refusal, identity, or group membership." }, { "id": "revolution-and-regime-change", "question": "Under what conjunctures do strain, elite fracture, organisation, legitimating frames, coercive openings, and international conditions produce reform, revolution, repression, or collapse?", "coverage_status": "not-supported-by-pinned-predecessors", "why_not_projectable": "Dissent and reform are represented as layers and claims, not as a tested model of revolutionary conjuncture, regime survival, or transition.", "needed_evidence": [ "Comparative revolution and regime-transition research with negative cases.", "Event sequences separating structural conditions, organisation, framing, coercion, contingency, and aftermath." ], "stop_condition": "Do not predict, incite, suppress, optimize, or authorize regime change from dissent, counterstory, legitimation, or public-response records." }, { "id": "fiscal-and-economic-shocks", "question": "How do taxation limits, debt, inflation, unemployment, scarcity, trade disruption, and ecological shocks alter state capacity, trust, class relations, and conflict?", "coverage_status": "not-supported-by-pinned-predecessors", "why_not_projectable": "The reality graph indexes economic and ecological domains but contains no shock model, fiscal series, distributional mechanism, or comparative causal evidence.", "needed_evidence": [ "Time-bounded fiscal, economic, ecological, institutional, and distributional records.", "Competing causal explanations, counterfactual assumptions, and lag structure." ], "stop_condition": "Do not infer shock, scarcity, fiscal capacity, distributional burden, social response, conflict, or policy effect from an indexed domain or temporal sequence." }, { "id": "propaganda-media-and-information-power", "question": "How do media ownership, distribution systems, censorship, repetition, targeting, disinformation, and counter-speech affect public knowledge and coordination?", "coverage_status": "not-supported-by-pinned-predecessors", "why_not_projectable": "The predecessors distinguish expression, artifact, distribution, exposure, response, selection, and suppression, but do not establish propaganda mechanisms or identify belief, persuasion, deception, or behavioural effects.", "needed_evidence": [ "Platform, ownership, distribution, content, exposure, audience, experimental or quasi-experimental, and institutional evidence kept separately typed.", "Rights, privacy, provenance, counterevidence, affected-party, and anti-targeting safeguards." ], "stop_condition": "Do not infer belief, persuasion, deception, susceptibility, intent, or behavioural effect, and do not create targeting, censorship, propaganda, counter-propaganda, or amplification instructions." }, { "id": "citizen-governance-dynamics", "question": "How do authorization, voice, participation, representation, public service performance, procedural justice, contestation, correction, and non-domination interact over time?", "coverage_status": "not-supported-by-pinned-predecessors", "why_not_projectable": "The reality graph separates claims, decisions, authority, consent, outcomes, assessment, and repair, but it does not provide empirical citizen-governance dynamics or confer jurisdiction on KINGDOM.", "needed_evidence": [ "Jurisdiction-specific constitutional, legal, administrative, participatory, service, and affected-party evidence.", "Explicit legitimacy concepts, institutional alternatives, dissent channels, correction rights, and non-jurisdiction boundaries." ], "stop_condition": "Do not treat participation as consent, decision as authority, performance as legitimacy, visibility as representation, governance vocabulary as jurisdiction, or KINGDOM as a sovereign government." } ], "boundaries": { "read_only": true, "structure_only": true, "public_static_publication_family": true, "network": false, "filesystem_write": false, "source_dereference": false, "predecessor_files_read_for_verification": true, "predecessor_mutation": false, "predecessor_republication": false, "historical_completeness_claimed": false, "unsupported_domains_filled": false, "score_or_rank": false, "causal_claim_created": false, "metaphysical_verdict": false, "belief_identity_intent_or_emotion_inferred": false, "person_or_group_targeting": false, "persuasion_or_propaganda_design": false, "prediction_or_simulation": false, "authority_granted": false, "consent_or_lawful_basis_established": false, "action_proposed": false, "action_attempted": false, "action_executed": false, "external_effect_claimed": false, "writes_wake": false, "writes_karma": false, "publication_trigger": false, "deployment_trigger": false, "automatic_action": false }, "integrity": { "algorithm": "sha256-recursive-sorted-json-keys-v1", "digest": "sha256:03c20d3976a7b449c009cac7736ab73aa9f17fa619951d3753ecbb69bcc1496b", "digest_field_zeroed": true } }